Articles Vol. 65 No. 1 18/01/2024

14. EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING THE GUIDE STREET IN PARTIAL IMPLANTATION

Dam Van Viet1,2, Trinh Hai Anh3,4
1 Hanoi Central Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology
2 Bệnh viện Răng Hàm Mặt Trung ương Hà Nội
3 Hanoi National University
4 Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
Corresponding author: implantdrviet@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65i1.887
16 Views
16 Downloads
Keywords
Implant, dentistry, guide troughs.
Abstract

Objective: Initial evaluation of the effectiveness of using guide troughs in partial implant implantation.

Subjects and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on 21 patients undergoing 34 standard implants at the Implant Department, Hanoi Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital from October 2021 to October 2022.

Results: The average implant torque in the study was 43,03 ± 9,095 Ncm; The deviation of the actual implant after surgery compared to the expected plan is within safe limits: deviation at the implant neck 0,8 ± 0,46 mm; at the tip: 0,9 ± 0,47 mm; angle 2,5 ± 0,38° and vertical: 0,7 ± 0,35 mm.

Conclusion: Using a surgical guide in partial implant implantation allows the implant to have good initial stability, playing an important role in successful osseointegration; Actual implant deviation after surgery is within safe limits.

References
[1]
Block MS, Dental Implants: The Last 100 Years; Google Scholar
[2]
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 76(1), 2018, 11-26. Google Scholar
[3]
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.045 Google Scholar
[4]
Lin C-C, Ishikawa M, Maida T et al., Google Scholar
[5]
Stereolithographic Surgical Guide with a Google Scholar
[6]
Combination of Tooth and Bone Support: Google Scholar
[7]
Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in Distal Google Scholar
[8]
Extension Situation; J Clin Med, 9(3), 2020, Google Scholar
[9]
E709. doi:10.3390/jcm9030709 Google Scholar
[10]
Chen Z, Li J, Sinjab K et al., Accuracy of flapless Google Scholar
[11]
immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla Google Scholar
[12]
using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: Google Scholar
[13]
A cadaver study; Clin Oral Implants Res, 29(12), Google Scholar
[14]
, 1186-1194. doi:10.1111/clr.13382 Google Scholar
[15]
Bùi Việt Hùng, Nghiên cứu phẫu thuật và đánh Google Scholar
[16]
giá kết quả cấy ghép nhóm răng trước, Luận án Google Scholar
[17]
tiến sỹ y học, Viện nghiên cứu Khoa học y dược Google Scholar
[18]
lâm sàng 108, 2017, tr. 119-201. Google Scholar
[19]
Demirkol N, Demirkol M, A retrospective Google Scholar
[20]
analysis of anterior single dental implants, Google Scholar
[21]
Annals of Medical Research, 26 (8), 2019, 1639-1642. Google Scholar
[22]
Trịnh Hồng Mỹ, Nghiên cứu kỹ thuật cấy ghép Google Scholar
[23]
implant trên bệnh nhân mất răng có ghép xương; Google Scholar
[24]
Luận án tiến sỹ y học, Viện nghiên cứu khoa học Google Scholar
[25]
y dược lâm sàng 108, Số đặc biệt, 2012, tr. 22-27 Google Scholar
[26]
Tạ Anh Tuấn, Nghiên cứu ứng dụng implant nha Google Scholar
[27]
khoa để nâng cao hiệu quả phục hình nha khoa; Google Scholar
[28]
Đề tài cấp bộ - Bộ Quốc phòng; Y học lâm sàng, Google Scholar
[29]
Số đặc biệt, 2007, tr. 33 – 38 Google Scholar
[30]
Đàm Văn Việt, Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm Google Scholar
[31]
trên từng phần bằng kỹ thuật implant có ghép Google Scholar
[32]
xương; Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Google Scholar
[33]
Hà Nội, 2013. Google Scholar
[34]
Christoph V, Georg S, Kurt J et al., Comparing Google Scholar
[35]
the accuracy of master models based on digital Google Scholar
[36]
intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster Google Scholar
[37]
casts, Physics in Medicine, 1, 2016, p.20-26 Google Scholar
[38]
Schelbert T, Gander T, Blumer M et al., Google Scholar
[39]
Accuracy of Computer-Guided Template-Based Google Scholar
[40]
Implant Surgery: A Computed TomographyBased Google Scholar
[41]
Clinical Follow-Up Study; Implant Dent, Google Scholar
[42]
(6), 2019, 556-563 (https://doi.org/10.1097/ Google Scholar
[43]
ID.0000000000000936). Google Scholar
[44]
Stübinger S, Buitrago-Tellez C, Cantelmi G, Google Scholar
[45]
Deviations between placed and planned implant Google Scholar
[46]
positions: An accuracy pilot study of skeletally 23. Google Scholar
[47]
supported stereolithographic surgical templates; Google Scholar
[48]
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:540-51 Google Scholar
[49]
(https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12019). Google Scholar
[50]
Magrin GL, Rafael SNF, Passoni BB et al., Google Scholar
[51]
Clinical and tomographic comparison of dental Google Scholar
[52]
implants placed by guided virtual surgery versus Google Scholar
[53]
conventional technique: A split-mouth randomized Google Scholar
[54]
clinical trial; J Clin Periodontol, 2020;47:120-8 Google Scholar
[55]
(https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13211) Google Scholar