Articles Vol. 64 No. 6 21/10/2023

31. THE SITUATION OF CESAREAN SECTION OF EACH GROUP DIVIDED BY ROBSON CLASSIFICATION AT CHUONG MY HOSPITAL

Vuong Thi Huong1,2, Nguyen Manh Thang3,4
1 Chuong My District General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa huyện Chương Mỹ
3 National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
4 Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương
Corresponding author: vuonghuong1291@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v64i6.837
23 Views
13 Downloads
Keywords
Robson classification, Cesarean section.
Abstract

Objectives: Describe the situation of Cesarean section (CS) of each group subdivided by Robson classification.

Research object and method: Include all the records of women which hospitalized and delivered by cesarean during the 2-year period from 01/2020 to 12/2021 were reviewed. Retrospective crossstudy.

Results: Ratio 21,16% caesarean section, in which groups 1, 2, 3 and 5 have the largest size, accounting for the majority of cases in which pregnant women give birth. Contributing the highest cesarean section rate were groups 5, 3, and 1 with 8.74%, 4.9%, and 4.26% cases respectively. Abnormal position group, multiple pregnancies 6, 7, 8, and 9 had a very high CS rate in each group >82%, however, group sizes 6, 7, 8, and 9 contributed to the overall cesarean rate of 1,35%. Groups 4 and 10 have relatively low rates of CS in each group and the size of each group in the population is small, which should contribute to the overall CS rate of less than 1%.

Conclusion: The cesarean section rate at Chuong My District General Hospital is 21.16%. Groups 1, 2, 3 and group 5 are the main contributors to the overall cesarean section rate.

References
[1]
“Appropriate technology for birth,” Lancet, vol. Google Scholar
[2]
, no. 8452, pp. 436–437, Aug. 1985.240 Google Scholar
[3]
P. Lumbiganon et al., “Method of delivery and Google Scholar
[4]
pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global Google Scholar
[5]
survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007- Google Scholar
[6]
,” Lancet, vol. 375, no. 9713, pp. 490–499, Feb. Google Scholar
[7]
, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5. Google Scholar
[8]
“NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2017-18,” Google Scholar
[9]
NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-andinformation/ Google Scholar
[10]
publications/statistical/nhs-maternitystatistics/2017-18 Google Scholar
[11]
(accessed Jul. 13, 2022). Google Scholar
[12]
“Total cesarean deliveries by maternal race: Google Scholar
[13]
United States, 2018-2020 Average,” March of Google Scholar
[14]
Dimes | PeriStats. Google Scholar
[15]
Lê Hoài Chương, Mai Trọng Dũng, Nguyễn Đức Google Scholar
[16]
Thắng & cs, Nhận xét thực trạng mổ lấy thai tại Google Scholar
[17]
Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương năm 2017, Tạp Google Scholar
[18]
chí Phụ sản, vol. 16, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2018. Google Scholar
[19]
Khảo sát tỷ lệ mổ lấy thai theo nhóm phân loại Google Scholar
[20]
của Robson tại Bệnh viện Hùng Vương năm 2016 Google Scholar
[21]
-2017, Luận văn tốt nghiệp bác sĩ nội trú, trường Google Scholar
[22]
Đại học Y dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2017. Google Scholar
[23]
Nguyễn Thị Hồng Phượng, Nghiên cứu tình Google Scholar
[24]
hình mổ lấy thai tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung Google Scholar
[25]
ương từ tháng 3/ 2016 đến tháng 5/2016, Luận Google Scholar
[26]
văn tốt nghiệp bác sĩ nội trú, Trường Đại học Y Google Scholar
[27]
Hà Nội, 2016. Google Scholar
[28]
Lê Đức Quân, Nghiên cứu chỉ định mổ lấy thai Google Scholar
[29]
theo phân loại Robson tại Bệnh viện đa khoa Google Scholar
[30]
huyện Vĩnh Lộc, Thanh Hóa trong 2 năm 2019 - Google Scholar
[31]
, Luận văn chuyên khoa II, Trường Đại học Google Scholar
[32]
Y Hà Nội, 2022. Google Scholar
[33]
J. P. Vogel et al., “Use of the Robson classification Google Scholar
[34]
to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: Google Scholar
[35]
a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry Google Scholar
[36]
surveys,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 3, Google Scholar
[37]
no. 5, pp. e260–e270, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/ Google Scholar
[38]
S2214-109X(15)70094-X. Google Scholar