Articles Vol. 64 No. 6 21/10/2023

27. DETERMINATION IN FULL-TERM NEWBORNS WITH SEPSIS AT VIETNAM NATIONAL CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL (2019 - 2021)

Tran Tat Thang1,2, Hoang Dinh Canh3,4
1 Nghe An Eye Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Mắt Nghệ An
3 National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology
4 Viện Sốt rét - Ký sinh trùng - Côn trùng Trung ương
Corresponding author: thangmatna@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v64i6.832
11 Views
1 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: The study was conducted to determine the role of the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

Methods: The study was designed using experimental, descriptive research method at the laboratory.

Results: Mean values of nCD64, mHLA-DR and SI in full-term newborns with sepsis were 10167.1 ± 6136.9 molecules/cell, 9898.4 ± 14173,9 molecules/cell, and 274.6 ± 287.5, respectively. SI and nCD64 had high values in the diagnosis of sepsis in full-term newborns (AUC = 0.8, p < 0.01), higher than that of CRP, platelets and white blood cells. The sensitivity and specificity of SI at the SI cut-off point > 29.1 were 95.1% and 41.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of nCD64 at the nCD64 cut-off point > 5004 were 88.2% and 44.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: SI and nCD64 are highly valuable in diagnosing sepsis in full-term newborns (AUC = 0.8, p < 0.01).

References
[1]
WHO, Neurocognitive impairment Shining a Google Scholar
[2]
spotlight on maternal and neonatal sepsis:World Google Scholar
[4]
reproductivehealth/topics/maternal perinatal/ Google Scholar
[5]
world-sepsis-day/en/>, accessed:06/07/2021 Google Scholar
[6]
Pek JH, Yap BJ et al., Neurocognitive impairment Google Scholar
[7]
after neonatal sepsis: protocol for a systematic Google Scholar
[8]
review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 10(6), Google Scholar
[9]
, pp.125-132 Google Scholar
[10]
Ng PC, Li G, Chui KM et al., Neutrophil CD64 Google Scholar
[11]
Is a Sensitive Diagnostic Marker for Early-Onset Google Scholar
[12]
Neonatal Infection. Pediatr Res, 56(5), 2004 Google Scholar
[13]
pp.796–803. Google Scholar
[14]
Genel F, Atlihan F, Ozsu E et al., Monocyte HLADR Google Scholar
[15]
expression as predictor of poor outcome in Google Scholar
[16]
neonates with late onset neonatal sepsis. Journal Google Scholar
[17]
of Infection, 60(3), 2010, pp. 224–228. Google Scholar
[18]
Lê Hùng Phong, Trần Thanh Tùng, Lê Văn Hiệp, Google Scholar
[19]
Nghiên cứu chỉ số CD64 trên người bệnh nhiễm Google Scholar
[20]
trùng huyết tại Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy; Tạp chí khoa Google Scholar
[21]
học Đại học Văn Lang; Số 21, Tháng 5, 2020, Google Scholar
[22]
[23]
Phạm Thị Ngọc Thảo, Nguyễn Lý Minh Duy và Google Scholar
[24]
CS, Đánh giá chỉ số nhiễm khuẩn huyết (tỷ số Google Scholar
[25]
CD64 trên bạch cầu đa nhân trung tính/HLADR Google Scholar
[26]
trên bạch cầu đơn nhân) trong nhiễm khuẩn Google Scholar
[27]
huyết, sốc nhiễm khuẩn; Tạp chí Y học Việt Google Scholar
[28]
Nam, 496, 2020, tr.555–563. Google Scholar
[29]
Nguyễn Như Tân, Bùi Quốc Thắng, Đặc điểm Google Scholar
[30]
dịch tễ học, lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả Google Scholar
[31]
điều trị nhiễm khuẩn huyết sơ sinh do klebsiella Google Scholar
[32]
spp. tại khối sơ sinh Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1 Google Scholar
[33]
/1/2008 đến 31/12/2009; Tạp chí Y học Thành Google Scholar
[34]
phố Hồ Chí Minh, 15(1); 2011, 52-58, Google Scholar
[35]
Du J, Li L, Dou Y et al., Diagnostic Utility of Google Scholar
[36]
Neutrophil CD64 as a Marker for Early-Onset Google Scholar
[37]
Sepsis in Preterm Neonates. PLOS ONE, 9(7), Google Scholar
[38]
, pp.103-110. Google Scholar
[39]
Manzoli TF, Troster EJ, Ferranti JF, Prolonged Google Scholar
[40]
suppression of monocytic human leukocyte Google Scholar
[41]
antigen-DR expression correlates with mortality Google Scholar
[42]
in pediatric septic patients in a pediatric tertiary Google Scholar
[43]
Intensive Care Unit. J Crit Care, Vol.33, 2017,pp.84–89. Google Scholar
[44]
Meisel C, Schefold JC, Pschowski R et Google Scholar
[45]
al., Granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating Google Scholar
[46]
factor to reverse sepsis-associated Google Scholar
[47]
immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, Google Scholar
[48]
placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am J Respir Google Scholar
[49]
Crit Care Med, 180(7), 2009, pp.640–648. Google Scholar
[50]
Tamulyte S, Kopplin J, Brenner T et al., Google Scholar
[51]
Monocyte HLA-DR assessment by a novel pointof- Google Scholar
[52]
care device is feasible for early identification Google Scholar
[53]
of icu patients with complicated courses-a proofof- Google Scholar
[54]
principle study; Front Immunol, 10, 2019,pp.432 - 440. Google Scholar
[55]
Goswami S, Gupta R, Ramji S, Flow Cytometry: Google Scholar
[56]
An Important Diagnostic Tool in Critically Ill Google Scholar
[57]
Preterm Neonates with Suspected Sepsis. Am J Google Scholar
[58]
Perinatol; 2020 Sep 29; pp.110-119 Google Scholar
[59]
Umlauf VN, Dreschers S, Orlikowsky TW, Google Scholar
[60]
Flow Cytometry in the Detection of Neonatal Google Scholar
[61]
Sepsis. International Journal of Pediatrics, Google Scholar
[62]
, pp.191 - 199 Google Scholar
[63]
Lam HS, Cheung HM, Poon TCW et al., Google Scholar
[64]
Neutrophil CD64 for daily surveillance of Google Scholar
[65]
systemic infection and necrotizing enterocolitis Google Scholar
[66]
in preterm infants. Clin Chem, 59(12), 2013, Google Scholar
[67]
PP.1753–1760. Google Scholar