Articles Vol. 64 No. 4 28/07/2023

14. INITIAL REVIEW OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY RESULTS IN CHILDREN AT THE VIETNAM NATIONAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL

Phan Thi Hien1,2, Nguyen Loi1,2, Chu Nhat Minh3,4
1 Vietnam National Children’s Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Nhi trung ương
3 Viet Duc University Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức
Corresponding author: phanthihienns@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v64i4.736
13 Views
9 Downloads
Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is very necessary in diagnosis and treatment of some biliopancreatic disorders on pediatrics. There are few published data on this issue even in major centers around the world.

Aims: Initial review of results and complication of ERCP in children. Materials and Methods: Descriptive study enrolled 10 retrospective and 5 prospective patients who performed ERCP in Vietnam National Children’s Hospital from July 1, 2018 to November 12, 2021.

Results: 8/15 (53,3%) boys and 7/15 (46,7%) girls from 6 to 15 years old. The indications of ERCP included recurrent pancreatitis in 11/15 (73,3%) children, choledocholithiasis 3/15 (20%), biliary fistula post-liver transplantation 1/15 (6,7%). The cannulation success rate in the overall procedure was in 13/15 patients (86,7%). Diagnose after ERCP were pancreatic duct dilatation by stones in 5/15 (33,3%) children, choledocholithiasis 2/15 (13,3%), pancreatic duct dilatation without reason 2/15 (13,3%), choledochal dilatation without reason 1/15 (6,7%), choledochal fistula 1/15 (6,7%), normal results 2/15 (13,3%) and failure 2/15 (13,3%). Interventional success rate was 100% (pancreatic stent in 7/7 children, stone extraction 7/7 and sphincterotomy 2/2. Acute pancreatitis after ERCP was 5/15 patients (33,3%).

Conclusion: ERCP in children had high diagnostic value (86.7%), effective in pancreaticobiliary disease treating (100%) and safe.

References
[1]
Nabi Z, Reddy DN, Advanced therapeutic Google Scholar
[2]
gastrointestinal endoscopy in children–today and Google Scholar
[3]
tomorrow. Clinical endoscopy, 2018, 51.2: 142. Google Scholar
[4]
Bollen TL, Van Santvoort HC, Besselink Google Scholar
[5]
MG et al., The Atlanta Classification of acute Google Scholar
[6]
pancreatitis revisited. Journal of British Surgery, Google Scholar
[7]
, 95(1), 6-21. Google Scholar
[8]
Tringali A, Thomson M, Dumonceau JM et al., Google Scholar
[9]
Pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Google Scholar
[10]
society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and Google Scholar
[11]
European society for paediatric gastroenterology Google Scholar
[12]
hepatology and nutrition (ESPGHAN) guideline Google Scholar
[13]
executive summary. Endoscopy, 2017, 49(01), Google Scholar
[15]
Yıldırım AE, Altun R, Ocal S et al., The safety Google Scholar
[16]
and efficacy of ERCP in the pediatric population Google Scholar
[17]
with standard scopes: Does size really matter?. Google Scholar
[18]
Springerplus, 2016, 5(1), 1-5. Google Scholar
[19]
Felux J, Sturm E, Busch A et al., ERCP in Google Scholar
[20]
infants, children and adolescents is feasible and Google Scholar
[21]
safe: results from a tertiary care center. United Google Scholar
[22]
European gastroenterology journal, 2017, 5.7: Google Scholar
[23]
[24]
Keil R, Drábek J, Lochmannová J et al., ERCP Google Scholar
[25]
in infants, children, and adolescents—Different Google Scholar
[26]
roles of the methods in different age groups. PloS Google Scholar
[27]
one, 2019, 14(1), e0210805. Google Scholar
[28]
Keane MG, Kumar M, Cieplik N et al., Google Scholar
[29]
Paediatric pancreaticobiliary endoscopy: a 21- Google Scholar
[30]
year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary Google Scholar
[31]
centre and systematic literature review. BMC Google Scholar
[32]
pediatrics, 2018, 18(1), 1-11. Google Scholar
[33]
Vitale DS, Lin TK, Trends in pediatric endoscopic Google Scholar
[34]
retrograde cholangiopancreatography and Google Scholar
[35]
interventional endoscopy. The Journal of Google Scholar
[36]
Pediatrics, 2021, 232, 10-12. Google Scholar