Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ16 05/11/2026

CLINICOPATHOLOGYCAL FEATURES OF EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CARCINOMA FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY

Nguyen Tran Khanh, Tran Ngoc Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD16.6993
19 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: To describe the pathological characteristics after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
(macroscopic disease, Chemotherapy Response Score – CRS at the ovary and omentum, vascular
invasion, and uterine invasion) and to analyze the association between CRS and selected clinical
characteristics Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 78
patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by
maximal cytoreductive surgery at K Hospital – Tan Trieu facility, from January 2025 to March
2026. Results: The rate of no gross residual disease was 16.7%; residual disease ≤1cm
accounted for 41.0% and >1cm for 42.3%. A CRS3 score (complete/near-complete response)
was achieved in 21.8% of patients at both the ovary and omentum. Vascular invasion was
recorded in 7.7% and uterine invasion in 26.9% of patients. Regarding the association with CRS:
patients ≥60 years old had a higher CRS3 rate than those <60 years old (26.8% vs 16.2%), but
the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05); stage IV patients had a higher CRS3 rate
than stage III patients (25.8% vs 19.1%), also without statistical significance (p>0.05); patients
whose CA125 level normalized completely after chemotherapy had a significantly higher CRS3
rate than those with incomplete decrease (92.1% vs 65%, p=0.004); the addition of Bevacizumab
to the chemotherapy regimen did not increase the CRS3 rate (p>0.05). Conclusion: Most

patients in this study still had residual gross disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the rate
of omental CRS3 was moderate. The degree of CA125 decline after chemotherapy was the only
factor significantly associated with the likelihood of achieving CRS3, whereas age, disease stage,
and the addition of Bevacizumab showed no significant association.

References
[1]
Böhm, S., Faruqi, A., Said, I., et al. (2015). Chemotherapy response score: Development and validation of a system to quantify histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(22), 2457–2463. Google Scholar
[2]
Chen, M., Jin, Y., Bi, Y., Li, Y., Shan, Y., & Pan, L. (2015). Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in epithelial ovarian cancer. Journal of Cancer, 6(5), 412–419. Google Scholar
[3]
Cohen, P. A., Powell, A., Böhm, S., et al. (2019). Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Gynecologic Oncology, 154(2), 441–448. Google Scholar
[4]
Garcia Garcia, Y., de Juan Ferré, A., Mendiola, C., et al. (2019). Efficacy and safety results from GEICO 1205, a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 29(6), 1050–1056. Google Scholar
[5]
Marsh, L. A., Kim, T. H., Zhang, M., et al. (2023). Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and its association with outcome: A surrogate marker of survival. Gynecologic Oncology, 177, 173–179. Google Scholar
[6]
Mezzapesa, F., De Leo, A., Coada, C. A., et al. (2026). Association between pathologic chemotherapy response score and pattern of recurrence in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The Oncologist, 31(4), oyag055. Google Scholar
[7]
Michaan, N., Chong, W. Y., Han, N. Y., Lim, M. C., & Park, S. Y. (2018). Prognostic value of pathologic chemotherapy response score in patients with ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 28(9), 1676–1682. Google Scholar
[8]
Ngô, V. T., Nguyễn, X. H., & Phùng, T. H. (2025). Kết quả phẫu thuật và đáp ứng hóa trị tân bổ trợ ung thư biểu mô buồng trứng giai đoạn tiến xa. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 555(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v555i3.16181 Google Scholar
[9]
Oufkir, N., Rouzier, R., Paoletti, X., & Bonneau, C. (2024). External validation of Standardized KELIM and platinum-resistant recurrence scores in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Journal of Ovarian Research, 17(1), 152. Google Scholar
[10]
Zorzato, P. C., Zannoni, G. F., Tudisco, R., et al. (2020). External validation of a ‘response score’ after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 30(1), 67–73. Google Scholar