Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ16 02/11/2026

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL TERBINAFINE AND GRISEOFULVIN IN THE TREATMENT OF DERMATOPHYTE TINEA CAPITIS

Le Thi Hue Anh, Pham Quynh Hoa, Dinh Huu Nghi
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD16.6943
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To compare treatment outcomes, symptom improvement, and recurrence between terbinafine and griseofulvin in dermatophyte tinea capitis.

Methods: A controlled clinical trial included 40 patients assigned by sealed-envelope drawing to terbinafine (n = 19) or griseofulvin (n = 21). Outcomes were assessed at 4 and 8 weeks using clinical cure and negative KOH microscopy; recurrence was monitored for 4 weeks after treatment. Available records did not provide enough detail to fully verify sequence generation, allocation concealment, or blinding.

Results: At week 4, complete cure was observed in 68.4% of the terbinafine group and 28.6% of the griseofulvin group (p = 0.014); negative KOH microscopy occurred in 68.4% and 28.6%, respectively (p = 0.012). Among patients not cured at week 4 who continued treatment, 6/6 in the terbinafine group and 15/15 in the griseofulvin group achieved cure at week 8. No recurrence was observed during the 4-week post-treatment follow-up.

Conclusion: In this small sample, terbinafine produced a higher early response than griseofulvin. Week-8 findings showed very good responses in both groups during the observed period, but they do not establish long-term equivalence or species-specific superiority because no stratified analysis was available and recurrence follow-up lasted only 4 weeks.

References
[1]
1. Jonathan Bar, Liat Samuelov, Eli Sprecher, Jacob Mashiah. Griseofulvin vs terbinafine for paediatric tinea capitis: When and for how long. Mycoses. 2019;62:949–953. doi:10.1111/myc.12970 Google Scholar
[2]
2. Rachel C. Hill, Jeremy A. W. Gold, Shari R. Lipner. Comprehensive Review of Tinea Capitis in Adults: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Presentations, and Management. J Fungi Basel Switz. 2024;10: 357. doi:10.3390/jof10050357 Google Scholar
[3]
3. Dược Thư Quốc Gia Việt Nam. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2018. Google Scholar
[4]
4. R. J. Hay. Tinea Capitis: Current Status. Mycopathologia. 2017;182: 87–93. doi:10.1007/s11046-016-0058-8 Google Scholar
[5]
5. N. S. Ryder. Terbinafine: mode of action and properties of the squalene epoxidase inhibition. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126 Suppl 39: 2–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb00001.x Google Scholar
[6]
6. Contin CG, Carvalho G de SM, Valinoto GCJ, Mayor SAS, Veasey JV. Tinea capitis: observations and clinical approach in a pediatric population of 99 cases. An Bras Dermatol. 2024;99: 279–283. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2023.03.008 Google Scholar
[7]
7. Gupta AK, Summerbell RC. Tinea capitis. Med Mycol. 2000;38:255–287. doi:10.1080/mmy.38.4.255.287 Google Scholar
[8]
8. Elewski BE, Cáceres HW, DeLeon L, El Shimy S, Hunter JA, Korotkiy N, et al. Terbinafine hydrochloride oral granules versus oral griseofulvin suspension in children with tinea capitis: results of two randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, international, controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:41–54. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.02.019 Google Scholar
[9]
9. Fuller LC, Smith CH, Cerio R, Marsden RA, Midgley G, Beard AL, et al. A randomized comparison of 4 weeks of terbinafine vs. 8 weeks of griseofulvin for the treatment of tinea capitis. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:321–327. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04022.x Google Scholar