Objective: To describe clinical and paraclinical characteristics and to evaluate adjuvant 4AC–4D (doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) in stage II–IIIA breast cancer at Hanoi Oncology Hospital. Subjects and methods: A retrospective descriptive study included 67 patients enrolled from June 2019 to June 2021 and followed until June 2026. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier and compared with the log-rank test. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Results: The 40–49-year group accounted for 40.3%. Stages IIA, IIB and IIIA comprised 53.7%, 28.4% and 17.9%, respectively. All 67 patients completed eight cycles; 59 (88.0%) received 90–100% of the planned dose and 8 (12.0%) received 85–90%. DFS rates at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months were 100%, 97.0%, 95.5%, 88.1% and 88.1%. OS at 48 and 60 months was 97.0%. Five-year DFS was associated with nodal status (p = 0.021) and stage (p = 0.027). Five-year OS was lower in pN2, stage IIIA, grade III, invasive lobular carcinoma and HER2-positive disease (p < 0.05), based on only two deaths sharing the same phenotype, so independent prognostic effects cannot be inferred. Neutropenia during AC occurred in 41.8% of patients (grade 3–4: 17.9%); no thrombocytopenia was recorded. Other toxicities, such as vomiting and stomatitis, occurred infrequently and were primarily grade 1–2. Conclusion: In this selected cohort of 67 eligible patients, adjuvant 4AC–4D yielded 5-year DFS of 88.1% and 5-year OS of 97.0%, with mainly grade 1–2, manageable toxicity.
ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY WITH THE 4AC–4D REGIMEN FOR STAGE II–IIIA BREAST CANCER AT HANOI ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL
27
Views
0
Downloads
Abstract
Keywords
breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy, 4AC–4D, disease-free survival, overall survival
References
[1]
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Viet Nam fact sheet. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Accessed 2026. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today
Google Scholar
[2]
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. Version 1.2025. NCCN.
Google Scholar
[3]
3. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100000 women from 86 randomised trials. Lancet. 2023; 401(10384): 1277-1292. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00285-4
Google Scholar
[4]
4. Sparano JA, Zhao F, Martino S, et al. Long-term follow-up of the E1199 phase III trial evaluating the role of taxane and schedule in operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(21):2353-2360. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.60.9271
Google Scholar
[5]
5. Probert J, Dodwell D, Broggio J, et al. Histological types of invasive breast cancer in 830000 women diagnosed in England during 1988-2016. J Pathol Clin Res. 2025; 11(5): e70043. doi:10.1002/2056-4538.70043.
Google Scholar
[6]
6. Qin YY, Li H, Guo XJ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without taxanes, in early or operable breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 19 randomized trials with 30698 patients. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26946. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026946
Google Scholar
[7]
7. Eiermann W, Pienkowski T, Crown J, et al. Phase III study of doxorubicin/ cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequential docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: BCIRG-005 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(29):3877-3884. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5437
Google Scholar