Articles Vol. 67 No. 10 25/10/2026

EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES BY STONE EXTRACTION USING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY AT TRUNG VUONG HOSPITAL

Hoang Cong Thanh, Pham Thi Hong Diep, Huynh Hieu Tam
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i10.6880
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of common bile duct stones by stone extraction using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at Trung Vuong Hospital.

Subjects and methods: This uncontrolled clinical interventional study included 109 patients with common bile duct stones who were indicated for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at Trung Vuong Hospital.

Results: The rate of complete stone clearance was 89.9%, effective biliary drainage was achieved in 97.2%, and favorable overall treatment outcomes were recorded in 92.7% of patients. The rate of intra-procedural or post-procedural complications was 4.6%. After 72 hours, the proportion of patients with fever decreased from 52.3% to 2.8%, and the visual analogue scale pain score decreased from 56.7 ± 19.5 to 20.2 ± 12.9. Total bilirubin decreased from 52.2 µmol/L to 31.0 µmol/L, and white blood cell count decreased from 9.79 G/L to 8.47 G/L. All changes were statistically significant, with p < 0.001. Patients with unfavorable outcomes had a higher pre-procedural white blood cell count than those with favorable outcomes.

Conclusion: In this study, stone extraction for common bile duct stones using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography achieved a high success rate, early improvement in clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters after intervention, and a low complication rate during in-hospital follow-up.

References
[1]
[1] Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy, 2019, 51 (5): 472-491. doi: 10.1055/a-0862-0346 Google Scholar
[2]
[2] ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Buxbaum J.L, Abbas Fehmi S.M et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 89 (6): 1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001 Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Dumonceau J.M, Kapral C, Aabakken L et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy, 2020, 52 (2): 127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080 Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25 (1): 17-30. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.512 Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Đặng Quang Nam, Nguyễn Trường Sơn, Nguyễn Thanh Nam và cộng sự. Kết quả điều trị sỏi ống mật chủ kích thước lớn bằng nội soi mật tụy ngược dòng kết hợp cắt cơ vòng Oddi và nong cơ vòng Oddi bằng bóng tại Trung tâm Tiêu hóa - Gan mật, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2025, 546 (1): 41-45. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v546i1.12490 Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Nguyễn Công Long, Lê Long Lực. Đánh giá kết quả phương pháp nội soi mật tụy ngược dòng ở bệnh nhân sỏi ống mật chủ tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2022, 513 (1): 62-65. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v513i1.2333 Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Zouki J, Sidhom D, Bindon R, Sidhu T, Chan E, Lyon M. Choledocholithiasis: a review of management and outcomes in a regional setting. Cureus, 2023, 15 (12): e50223. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50223 Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Miura F, Okamoto K, Takada T et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: initial management of acute biliary infection and flowchart for acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25 (1): 31-40. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.509 Google Scholar