Articles Vol. 67 No. 10 25/10/2026

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES OF FETAL CYSTIC HYGROMA AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Tran Thuy Linh, Tran Danh Cuong, Nguyen Thi Thuy Duong, Nguyen Thi Bich Van
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i10.6874
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe prenatal diagnostic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with cystic hygroma at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study included 227 singleton pregnancies with fetal cystic hygroma managed at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center. Maternal age, gestational age at diagnosis, nuchal translucency (NT), associated structural anomalies, invasive genetic-test findings and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Median maternal age was 30 years (IQR 27-35); 74.4% were diagnosed at 11-13 weeks 6 days. Mean NT was 8.31 mm. Isolated cystic hygroma accounted for 71.8%, and hydrops was the most frequent associated abnormality (39.2%). Amniocentesis was performed in 38/227 cases (16.7%); chromosomal/genetic findings were reported in 18/38 tested cases (47.4%). Pregnancy termination occurred in 87.7%, miscarriage in 2.2%, live birth in 7.9%, and 2.2% remained under follow-up. NT category was associated with a normal live-birth outcome (p<0.001), with the highest favorable rate when NT was <6 mm.

Conclusions: Fetal cystic hygroma was usually detected in the first trimester and was associated with frequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. NT thickness and associated fetal anomalies are important for prenatal counseling, genetic testing and pregnancy management.

References
[1]
[1] International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bilardo CM, Chaoui R, Hyett JA, Kagan KO, Karim JN, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(1):127-143. doi:10.1002/uog.26106. Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Saade GR, Berkowitz RL, et al. First-trimester septated cystic hygroma: prevalence, natural history, and pediatric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):288-294. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000173318.54978.1f. Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Wang MJ, Bazan M, Hsieh T, Mita C, Ferrés MA, Oyelese Y. Perinatal outcomes of cystic hygroma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025;7(7):101704. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101704. Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Chen YN, Chen CP, Lin CJ, Chen SW. Prenatal ultrasound evaluation and outcome of pregnancy with fetal cystic hygromas and lymphangiomas. J Med Ultrasound. 2017;25(1):12-15. doi:10.1016/j.jmu.2017.02.001. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Yakıştıran B, Altınboğa O, Canpolat E, Çakar EŞ, Çelen Ş, Çağlar AT, Üstün YE. Analysis of cystic hygroma diagnosed in the first trimester: single-center experience. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2020;21(2):107-110. doi:10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2019.0032. Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Aymelek HS, Oğur G, Tosun M, Abur U, Altundağ E, Çelik H, et al. Genetic burden and outcome of cystic hygromas detected antenatally: results of 93 pregnancies from a single center in the northern region of Turkey. J Med Ultrasound. 2019;27(4):181-186. Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Molina FS, Avgidou K, Kagan KO, Poggi S, Nicolaides KH. Cystic hygromas, nuchal edema, and nuchal translucency at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(3):678-683. Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Ghi T, Sotiriadis A, Calda P, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(2):256-268. doi:10.1002/uog.15945. Google Scholar
[9]
[9] Phạm Xuân Minh, Trần Danh Cường. Nghiên cứu chẩn đoán trước sinh dị dạng bạch mạch dạng nang tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương. Tạp chí Phụ sản. 2017;15(2):95-99. doi:10.46755/vjog.2017.2.335. Google Scholar
[10]
[10] Narava S, Balbir Singh S, Barpanda S, Bricker L. Outcome of pregnancies with first-trimester increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygroma in a tertiary maternity hospital in United Arab Emirates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(3):841-849. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14222. Google Scholar