Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ15 25/09/2026

PREGNANCY OUTCOMES AMONG TERM PREGNANT WOMEN WITH NUCHAL CORD DURING LABOR AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Do Thi Khanh Van, Pham Tuan Linh, Tran Thi Thu Hanh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD15.6770
12 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate pregnancy outcomes among term pregnant women with nuchal cord during labor at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among eligible term pregnant women with nuchal cord during labor at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 02/2026 to 05/2026.

Results: The study findings showed that most term pregnant women with nuchal cord were young, with a mean maternal age of 30.08 ± 5.02 years, and the majority were under 35 years of age. Most pregnancies were full-term (80.53% between 37–40 weeks of gestation), and multiparous women accounted for 61.95% of the study population. Overall pregnancy outcomes were favorable, with a markedly high rate of vaginal delivery (89.38%) and a low rate of obstetric intervention. The primary indications for cesarean section were fetal distress and arrest of descent. Although fetal heart rate abnormalities (30.97%) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (9.73%) were observed in some cases, the mean duration of labor was not significantly prolonged (4.27 ± 2.42 hours). The mean neonatal birth weight was 3161.94 ± 340.25 g, with the majority of neonates weighing more than 2500 g (97.35%). No cases of severe neonatal complications or neonatal mortality were recorded.

Conclusion: Term pregnancies complicated by nuchal cord were generally associated with favorable obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

References
[1]
1. Majeed DB, Gupta DCP, Gupta DT. INCIDENCE AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF NUCHAL CORD: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. Published online February 5, 2025:2675-2684. doi:10.70135/seejph.vi.4245 Google Scholar
[2]
2. Shrestha NS, Singh N. Nuchal cord and perinatal outcome. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2007;5(3):360-363. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery, and management: a questionnaire survey of pregnant women. HKMJ. March 17, 2015. Accessed May 22, 2026. https://www.hkmj.org/abstracts/v21n2/143.htm Google Scholar
[4]
4. Kobayashi N, Aoki S, Oba MS, Takahashi T, Hirahara F. Effect of Umbilical Cord Entanglement and Position on Pregnancy Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:342065. doi:10.1155/2015/342065 Google Scholar
[5]
5. Nguyễn Ngọc Rạng, Trương Kim Thuyên. Dây rốn quấn cổ lúc sinh và kết cục trên thai nhi tại Bệnh viện sản nhi An Giang. VMJ. 2021;498(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v498i2.163 Google Scholar
[6]
6. C SKH, Tharihalli CT, K C, Gaddi SF. Study of length of umbilical cord and fetal outcome: a study of 1000 deliveries. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;6(9):3770-3775. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173622 Google Scholar
[7]
7. Hayes DJL, Warland J, Parast MM, et al. Umbilical cord characteristics and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239630. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239630 Google Scholar
[8]
8. Dias Z, Kore S. Perinatal outcome in pregnancies with nuchal cord: prospective cross-sectional study at tertiary care institute. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;10(6):2368-2373. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20212177 Google Scholar