Articles Vol. 67 No. 9 25/09/2026

SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION OF HEAT STRAIN WHILE WEARING MEDICAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING UNDER SIMULATED HOT CONDITIONS IN MALE MEDICAL STUDENTS

Nguyen Hoang Trung, Tong Duc Minh, Nguyen Van Chuyen, Phan Van Manh, Vu Minh Tuan
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i9.6756
13 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

 

Objective: To describe subjective heat strain while wearing medical protective clothing (MPC) under simulated hot conditions in male medical students.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on the subjective-response dataset of 30 healthy male medical students who participated in an experimental trial at the climatic chamber of Vietnam Military Medical University from April to August 2025. Participants wore MPC and performed cycling exercise at 15 km/h for 30 minutes in an environment of 32°C and 82% relative humidity. Immediately after exercise, they were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to record discomfort level, symptoms during and after exercise, effects on exercise performance, recovery time, and impact on daily activities after exercise.

Results: A total of 96.7% of participants reported some degree of discomfort during exercise, and 70.0% reported that they sometimes or frequently had to pause or reduce exercise intensity. The most common symptoms during exercise were palpitations or rapid heartbeat (33.3%), dyspnea or oppressive breathing sensation (26.7%), and excessive sweating (23.3%). After exercise, thirst was the most common symptom (20.0%), and 63.3% of participants required 5–10 minutes to recover. Overall, 70.0% reported that daily activities after exercise were affected to varying degrees.

Conclusion: Wearing MPC under simulated hot conditions caused marked subjective heat strain, affecting exercise tolerance, short-term recovery, and daily functioning after exercise in male medical students.

Keywords: medical protective clothing, heat strain, subjective

References
[1]
[1] World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19): interim guidance, 19 March 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Galanis P, Vraka I, Fragkou D, Bilali A, Kaitelidou D. Impact of personal protective equipment use on health care workers’ physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(10):1305-1315. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.084 Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Lee J, Venugopal V, Latha PK, Alhadad SB, Leow CHW, Goh NY, et al. Heat stress and thermal perception amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in India and Singapore. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8100. doi:10.3390/ijerph17218100 Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Davey SL, Lee BJ, Robbins T, Randeva H, Thake CD. Heat stress and PPE during COVID-19: impact on healthcare workers’ performance, safety and well-being in NHS settings. J Hosp Infect. 2021;108:185-188. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.027 Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Bongers CCWG, de Korte JQ, Zwartkruis M, Levels K, Kingma BRM, Eijsvogels TMH. Heat strain and use of heat mitigation strategies among COVID-19 healthcare workers wearing personal protective equipment: a retrospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1905. doi:10.3390/ijerph19031905 Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Rojo-Rojo A, Pujalte-Jesús MJ, Hernández-Sánchez E, Rincón-Jiménez C, Echevarría Pérez P, Múzquiz Ruiz MÁ, et al. Risk of dehydration due to sweating while wearing personal protective equipment in COVID-19 clinical care: a pilot study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(2):267. doi:10.3390/healthcare10020267 Google Scholar
[7]
[7] de Korte JQ, Bongers CCWG, Catoire M, Kingma BRM, Eijsvogels TMH. Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses. Temperature (Austin). 2022;9(1):103-113. doi:10.1080/23328940.2020.1868386 Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Notley SR, Kenny GP, Akerman AP, Flouris AD, Gagnon D, Poirier MP, et al. Physiological monitoring for occupational heat stress management: recent advancements and remaining challenges. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2025;50(3):208-224. doi:10.1139/apnm-2024-0414 Google Scholar