Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ15 25/09/2026

PATIENT EXPERIENCE AMONG INTERNAL MEDICINE OUTPATIENTS AT BA VI GENERAL HOSPITAL, HANOI CITY, 2026

Nguyen Can Chung, Tran Quoc Lam
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD15.6736
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe the experience of patients attending the internal medicine outpatient service and to explore factors perceived by participants as influencing patient experience at the Outpatient Department of Ba Vi General Hospital, Hanoi, in 2026.

Methods: A mixed-methods descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from March to September 2026. The quantitative component included 201 patients aged 18 years or older who had completed the outpatient care process and were selected using systematic random sampling over 20 working days. The qualitative component included 27 purposively selected participants. In-depth interviews were conducted with five representatives of hospital and department management and eight patients, while two focus group discussions were conducted with seven physicians and seven nurses from the Outpatient Department. Patient experience was assessed across seven dimensions using a 5-point scale; scores of 4-5 were classified as positive experience.

Results: The overall patient experience score was 4.5 ± 0.6, and 88.6% of patients were classified as having a positive experience. The highest proportions of positive ratings were observed for physical facilities (98%), medical examination and treatment services (97%), healthcare costs (95.5%), and communication with healthcare staff (92%). Waiting time was the least favorably rated dimension, with only 20.4% of patients reporting a positive experience; specifically, only 6.5% positively rated the waiting time for diagnostic test results. The qualitative findings identified several facilitating factors, including improved physical facilities, generally clear care processes, electronic payment options, and positive staff attitudes. The main challenges reported were the concentration of patients during certain peak periods, uneven capacity across diagnostic services, difficulties experienced by older patients in navigating the hospital, and limited time for providing explanations and counseling.

Conclusion: Overall patient experience was rated positively, although ratings varied markedly across dimensions. Priority areas for improvement include reducing waiting times throughout the outpatient care journey, particularly for diagnostic services and the return of test results; strengthening support for older patients and first-time attendees; and standardizing clinical explanations.

References
[1]
[1] Oben P. Understanding the patient experience: a conceptual framework. J Patient Exp, 2020, 7 (6): 906-910. doi: 10.1177/2374373520951672 Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Doyle C et al. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 2013, 3 (1): e001570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570 Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Larson E et al. When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care. Bull World Health Organ, 2019, 97 (8): 563-569. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.225201 Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Huỳnh Mỹ Thư. Trải nghiệm của người bệnh khi khám chữa bệnh ngoại trú và một số yếu tố ảnh hưởng tại Bệnh viện quận Thủ Đức, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh năm 2020. Luận văn thạc sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y tế công cộng, 2020. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Thach Phuong Nhung et al. Improving hospital’s quality of service in Vietnam: the patient satisfaction evaluation in multiple health facilities. Hosp Top, 2023, 101 (2): 73-83. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2021.1969871 Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Zarei E. Service quality of hospital outpatient departments: patients’ perspective. Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 2015, 28 (8): 778-790. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2015-0018 Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Kaur M et al. Cross-sectional study of clients’ satisfaction with outpatient and inpatient services of public health facilities of a North Indian state. J Family Med Prim Care, 2020, 13: 1178632920929969. doi: 10.1177/1178632920929969 Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Nguyen Thi Thao Suong et al. Waiting time in the outpatient clinic at a national hospital in Vietnam. Nagoya J Med Sci, 2018, 80 (2): 227-239. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.80.2.227 Google Scholar
[9]
[9] Tsiga E et al. The influence of time pressure on adherence to guidelines in primary care: an experimental study. BMJ Open, 2013, 3 (4): e002944. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002944 Google Scholar
[10]
[10] Pel-Littel R.E et al. Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21 (1): 112. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02055-y. Google Scholar
[11]
[11] Wu J et al. A design framework of medical wayfinding signs for the elderly: based on the situational cognitive commonness. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19 (21). doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114251 Google Scholar
[12]
[12] Xuan X et al. Study of the physical environment of waiting areas and its effects on patient satisfaction, experience, perceived waiting time, and behavior in China. HERD, 2021, 14 (3): 108-123. doi: 10.1177/1937586720982548 Google Scholar
[13]
[13] Vu Thi Thanh Huyen et al. Mobile phone usage and willingness to use mobile phones to support medication adherence and receive text message appointment reminders in older outpatients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2026, 20 (3): 954-961. doi: 10.1177/19322968241306438 Google Scholar