Articles Vol. 67 No. 9 30/09/2026

A SCOPING REVIEW OF THE TREATMENT FOR ALLERGIC RHINITIS USING ANTIHISTAMINE NASAL SPRAY

Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung, Do Ba Hung, Dao Trung Dũng, Tran Thi Thu Hang
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i9.6686
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To synthesize the results of studies on nasal antihistamine sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Methods: A scoping review. Results: Of the total number of studies searched in the Pubmed database, 12 met the inclusion criteria. All were intervention studies. To evaluate the effectiveness of nasal antihistamine sprays for allergic rhinitis, several methods are used, such as the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS). Seven out of twelve studies applied the TNSS score, showing that after two weeks of treatment, the average TNSS score improved by 14.1% to 39.2% in the nasal antihistamine spray group compared to a 4.5% to 27% improvement in the placebo group. Assessment of four individual functional symptoms in the nose and eye symptoms were evaluated. The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) was used in 5 out of 12 studies, showing significant changes in the nasal antihistamine group compared to the control group. Conclusion: Nasal antihistamine spray is a good method to improve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and significantly improving the quality of life for patients.

References
[1]
1.Bousquet J et al (2008). Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008*, Allergy, vol. 63, 8-160. Google Scholar
[2]
2.Weinmayr G, Forastiere F, Weiland SK, et al (2008). International variation in prevalence of rhinitis and its relationship with sensitisation to perennial and seasonal allergens. Eur Respir J; 32:1250-1261. Google Scholar
[3]
3.Ray NF, Baraniuk JN, Thamer M, et al. Direct expenditures for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in 1996, including the contributions of related airway illnesses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103: 401– 407 Google Scholar
[4]
4.Kaliner MA. Azelastine and olopatadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;103(5):373-380. doi:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60355-9 Google Scholar
[5]
5.Patanase® (olopatadine hydrochloride) 665 mcg Nasal Spray [prescribing information]. Fort Worth, TX: Alcon Laboratories; 2009. Google Scholar
[6]
6.Lytinas M, Kempuraj D, Huang M, et al. Azelastine's inhibition of histamine and tryptase release from human umbilical cord blood-derived cultured mast cells as well as rat skin mast cell-induced vascular permeability: comparison with olopatadine. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2002;23(1):45-51. Google Scholar
[7]
7.Horak F. Effectiveness of twice daily azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008;4(5):1009-1022. doi:10.2147/tcrm.s3229 Google Scholar
[8]
8.Kremer, B et al. “Generic or disease-specific quality of life scales to characterize health status in allergic rhinitis?.” Allergy vol. 56,10 (2001): 957-63. doi:10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00919.x Google Scholar