Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ15 25/09/2026

EVALUATION OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF T1 GLOTTIC CANCER AT THE NATIONAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HOSPITAL

Tran The Quang, Nguyen Quang Trung, Nguyen Toan Thang
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD15.6671
19 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate local recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and voice quality after CO2 laser and open surgery for T1 vocal cord carcinoma.

Subjects and methods: A retrospective descriptive study of 258 patients with T1 vocal cord cancer who underwent CO2 laser and open surgery at the National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital from January 2020 to June 2025.

Results: The recurrence rate was 2.5% in the laser group and 8.3% in the open surgery group; the average time to recurrence was 16.1 months; the disease-free survival time was 68.1 months in the laser group and 65.3 months in the open surgery group; the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 97.5% in the laser group and 91.7% in the open surgery group; the average overall survival time was 70.4 months. The overall 3-year survival rate for the laser group was 98.9%, while for the open surgery group it was 98.5%; the VHI-10 score for the laser group was 18.43 ± 4.98 points (a decrease of 7.99 ± 5.15 points compared to pre-surgery), and for the open surgery group it was 19.85 ± 4.62 points (a decrease of 7.91 ± 4.21 points compared to pre-surgery).

Conclusion: CO2 laser surgery shows advantages over open surgery in terms of cancer outcomes and speech function in T1 vocal cord cancer.

References
[1]
1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 Google Scholar
[2]
2. Thái Bá Mạnh, Nguyễn Quang Trung. Đánh giá biến chứng sớm của vi phẫu thuật thanh quản bằng laser qua đường miệng tại bệnh viện Tai mũi họng Trung Ương giai đoạn 2012-2021. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023;532(1B):194-197. https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i1B.7509 Google Scholar
[3]
3. Mariani C, Carta F, Bontempi M, et al. Management and Oncologic Outcomes of Close and Positive Margins after Transoral CO(2) Laser Microsurgery for Early Glottic Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(5). doi: 10.3390/cancers15051490 Google Scholar
[4]
4. Piazza C, Paderno A, Del Bon F, et al. Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of 1188 Tis-T2 Glottic Cancers Treated by Transoral Laser Microsurgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;165(2):321-328. doi: 10.1177/0194599820983727 Google Scholar
[5]
5. Bassani S, Dedivitis RA, Molteni G, et al. A systematic review on oncological outcomes, functional results, and laryngeal preservation in vertical partial laryngectomies vs. transoral laser microsurgery for early stage glottic cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2026;283(2):683-689. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09657-6 Google Scholar
[6]
6. Luo C, Lv K, Liu Q, et al. Comparison of laser microsurgery and open partial laryngectomy for T1-2 laryngeal cancer treatment. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(6):464. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-135 Google Scholar
[7]
7. Maurizi M, Almadori G, Plaudetti G, De Corso E, Galli J. Laser carbon dioxide cordectomy versus open surgery in the treatment of glottic carcinoma: our results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(6):857-861. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.038 Google Scholar
[8]
8. Nguyễn Quang Trung và cộng sự. Đánh giá tỷ lệ sống thêm và tỷ lệ tái phát sau vi phẫu thuật cắt ung thư thanh quản bằng laser qua đường miệng tại Bệnh viện Tai Mũi Họng Trung ương. Tạp chí y dược lâm sàng 108. 2024;19, HNNCS:61–66. https://doi.org/10.52389/ydls.v19incs.2363 Google Scholar
[9]
9. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1549-1556. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009 Google Scholar
[10]
10. Zhang P, Chen W, Chen K, Ye Y, Wu W. Transoral laser microsurgery and open partial laryngectomy for limited-stage glottic cancer: a review of indications, oncologic and functional outcome, and prognosis. Am J Transl Res. 2026;18(3):1792-1807. doi: 10.62347/EJKB8035 Google Scholar