Articles Vol. 67 No. 9 25/09/2026

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH EARLY MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK

Dang Viet Duc, Nguyen The Hai, Nguyen Duy Toan
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i9.6661
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To identify clinical, paraclinical, and treatment factors associated with early mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Subjects and Methods: A longitudinal descriptive study combining prospective and retrospective data was conducted on 70 patients with cardiogenic shock treated at the Institute of Cardiology, 108 Military Central Hospital from January 2024 to February 2026. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, treatment modalities, and prognostic scoring systems were collected and analyzed. Comparisons were made between survivors and non-survivors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with early mortality. Results: The mean age was 69.3 ± 17 years, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1.8:1. The 30-day mortality rate was 47.1%. Factors associated with higher mortality included age ≥60 years (p=0.045), female sex (p=0.036), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (p=0.005), SCAI stage E (p=0.019), use of ≥2 vasopressors (p=0.002), invasive mechanical ventilation (p=0.013), and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support (p=0.049).

Regarding laboratory findings, the mortality group had lower arterial pH (7.22 ± 0.13 vs. 7.31 ± 0.12, p=0.003), higher anion gap (median 23.0 vs. 18.1, p=0.001), and lower SaO₂ (93.44 ± 7.25% vs. 96.58 ± 4.96%, p=0.041). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the BOS.MA2 score was independently associated with early mortality (OR = 3.11; 95%CI: 1.22–7.97; p=0.018). Conclusion: Early mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock remains high. Older age, female sex, cardiac arrest, severe shock according to SCAI stage E, severe metabolic acidosis, and the need for intensive circulatory and respiratory support were associated with poor prognosis. The BOS.MA2 score demonstrated value in early mortality risk stratification.

References
[1]
1. Yamga,E. S. Mantena (2023), Optimized Risk Score to Predict Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. J Am Heart Assoc 12(6-9) Google Scholar
[2]
2. Phạm Mạnh Hùng vs CS (2022), Đồng thuận của hội Tim mạch học Việt Nam về chẩn đoán và xử trí sốc tim năm 2022. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 340:12. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Baran D. A.,C. L. Grines (2019), SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: this document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 94(1) Google Scholar
[4]
4. Pöss J., J. Köster, G. Fuernau, et al. (2017), Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 69(15):1913-1920. Google Scholar
[5]
5. Oliva F., A. Mortara, G. Cacciatore, et al. (2012), Acute heart failure patient profiles, management and in-hospital outcome: results of the Italian Registry on Heart Failure Outcome. 14(11) Google Scholar
[6]
6. Nguyễn Thị Hảo và CS (2024), Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị bệnh nhân sốc tim do nhồi máu cơ tim cấp. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 540:4-9. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Nguyễn Thị Thu Hương và CS (2024), Giá trị tiên lượng của phân loại SCAI về sốc tim ở bệnh nhân suy tim cấp mất bù. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 670:3-9. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Harjola V.-P., J. Lassus, A. Sionis, et al. (2015), Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 17(5):501-509. Google Scholar