Articles Vol. 67 No. 9 25/09/2026

CLINICAL AND SUBCLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EARLY OUTCOMES AFTER PROPHYLACTIC CERVICAL CERCLAGE IN HIGH-RISK PREGNANT WOMEN AT CAN THO CITY OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL

Nguyen Thi My Truc, Phan Huu Thuy Nga, Vu Dang Khoa, Lam Thanh Quang
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i9.6659
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe clinical and subclinical characteristics and evaluate early outcomes after prophylactic cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in high-risk pregnant women at Can Tho City Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from 2024 to 2026.

Subjects and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 36 high-risk pregnant women who underwent prophylactic cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth.

Results: The gestational age at cervical cerclage was most frequently 15–19 weeks (52.8%), followed by 12–14 weeks (41.7%), while cerclage after 20 weeks accounted for 5.6%. All patients remained free of post-procedural labor during early follow-up. However, 97.2% of patients experienced post-cerclage symptoms, with lower abdominal pain being the most common complaint. Within the first three days after cerclage, 66.7% of patients were hospitalized for fewer than three days. The mean length of hospital stay was 3 ± 1 days.

Conclusion: The study findings showed that prophylactic cervical cerclage was mainly performed before 20 weeks of gestation. During the early post-procedural follow-up period, no cases of labor or serious complications were recorded, suggesting that cervical cerclage has short-term safety in high-risk pregnant women when appropriately indicated and closely monitored.

References
[1]
[1] World Health Organization. Preterm birth. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Shennan A, Story L, Jacobsson B, Grobman WA. FIGO good practice recommendations on cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2021;155(1):19-22. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13835. Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Shennan AH, Story L. Cervical Cerclage: Green-top Guideline No. 75. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2022;129(7):1178-1210. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17003. Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;117(3):663-71. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ca847. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Liu Y, Ke Z, Liao W, Chen H, Wei S, Lai X, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and superiorities of prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency pregnant women. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2018;297(6):1503-8. doi:10.1007/s00404-018-4766-9. Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Tăng Xuân Hải, Trần Minh Long, Nguyễn Xuân Chung. Đánh giá kết quả khâu vòng cổ tử cung trong điều trị dự phòng sẩy thai và sinh non tại Bệnh viện Sản Nhi Nghệ An. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng. 2023;64(2). doi:10.52163/yhc.v64i2.605. Google Scholar
[7]
[7] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):372-9. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc. Google Scholar
[8]
[8] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 171: Management of Preterm Labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016;128(4). doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001711. Google Scholar