Background: The appropriate selection of anesthetic techniques in upper limb surgery plays a crucial role in ensuring patient safety, effective pain control, and optimal postoperative outcomes. However, in Vietnam, data on real-world clinical practice regarding anesthetic choices remain limited. Objectives: To investigate the distribution of anesthetic techniques and analyze factors associated with the selection of general anesthesia in upper limb surgery. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 151 patients undergoing upper limb surgery at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital - Ho Chi Minh City Data collection was performed after the study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nguyen Tat Thanh University. Variables included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, type of surgery, and operative duration. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: General anesthesia was the most commonly used technique (39.1%), followed by brachial plexus block (35.8%) and local anesthesia (25.2%). No statistically significant associations were found between anesthetic technique and age, sex, BMI, or comorbidities (p > 0.05). In contrast, the type of surgery and operative duration were significantly associated with anesthetic choice (p < 0.001), with general anesthesia being preferred for more complex and longer procedures. Conclusion: The selection of anesthetic techniques in upper limb surgery is primarily determined by surgical characteristics rather than patient-related factors. These findings provide practical evidence for optimizing anesthetic strategies in clinical practice.
FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SELECTION OF ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES IN UPPER LIMB SURGERY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY AT ORTHOPEDIC AND REHABILITATION HOSPITAL - HO CHI MINH CITY
1
Views
0
Downloads
Abstract
Keywords
anesthesia, general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, upper limb surgery.
References
[1]
1. Stevanovic MV, Sharpe F (2017). Green’s Operative Hand Surgery
Google Scholar
[2]
2. Azar FM, Beaty JH, Canale ST (2017). Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 13th ed. Elsevier
Google Scholar
[3]
3. Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Tornetta P. (2015) Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Google Scholar
[4]
4. Rukewe A, Fatiregun A, Alonge TO. (2014) Orthopaedic anaesthesia for upper extremity procedures in a Nigerian hospital. Malawi Med J;26(3):90–92. PMCID: PMC4248045
Google Scholar
[5]
5. Jarbo K, Chakraborty K, Sarkar D, Kaushik PB (2020). Evaluation of anaesthetic techniques for surgery of upper extremities. MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology
Google Scholar
[6]
6. Neal JM, et al. (2009) Upper extremity regional anesthesia: Essentials of our current understanding. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819624eb
Google Scholar
[7]
7. Hadzic A (2013). Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Anatomy for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia. 2nd ed.
Google Scholar
[8]
8. Thiele EL, Nemergut EC. Miller’s Anesthesia, 9th edition (2020). Anesth Analg;130(6):e187–e188.
Google Scholar