Articles Vol. 67 No. 9 25/09/2026

DEFINITIVE CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Dang Hoai Nam, Dao Van Tu, Nguyen Thi Thu Huong
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i9.6621
2 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without induction chemotherapy (IC) in patients with unresectable locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 159 patients with stage II–IVA cervical cancer who received CCRT with weekly Cisplatin, with or without weekly Paclitaxel–Carboplatin induction chemotherapy, at K Hospital between January 2024 and May 2025. Results: Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed between the IC and non-IC groups in terms of age, stage distribution and histopathology (p > 0.05). At a median follow-up of 18.7 months (range, 14.4 – 23.3 months), the objective response rate (ORR) after induction chemotherapy was 85.7%. Following CCRT, the ORR in the IC plus CCRT group and the CCRT-alone group was 80.7% and 90.2%, respectively (p = 0.180). The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 70.2% for the IC plus CCRT group and 74.5% for the CCRT-alone group (p = 0.555). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events was higher in the induction chemotherapy group compared to the CCRT-alone group, including anemia (25.6% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.001), neutropenia (42.1% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.001), and thrombocytopenia (15.8% vs. 2%, p = 0.001). The rates of radiation-induced proctitis and cystitis in the two groups were 15.8% vs. 5.9% (p = 0.04) and 28.1% vs. 8.8% (p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy demonstrated no statistically significant differences in ORR and 12-month PFS, but significantly increased grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities as well as the incidence of radiation proctitis and cystitis.

References
[1]
1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. doi:10.3322/caac.21834 Google Scholar
[2]
2. Pubweb.vn. Tình hình bệnh ung thư tại Việt Nam theo GLOBOCAN 2022 [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 15]. Available from: https://nci.vn/tin-tuc/tinh-hinh-benh-ung-thu-tai-viet-nam-theo-globocan-2022-58 Google Scholar
[3]
3. Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị một số bệnh ung bướu (Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 1514/QĐ-BYT ngày 01/4/2020 của Bộ trưởng Bộ Y tế) | Sở Y tế TP. Hồ Chí Minh [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 17]. Available from: https://medinet.hochiminhcity.gov.vn/van-ban-cua-so-y-te/huong-dan-chan-doan-va-dieu-tri-mot-so-benh-ung-buou-ban-hanh-kem-theo-quyet-di-vbct4639-28786.aspx Google Scholar
[4]
4. Boeckman HJ, Trego KS, Turchi JJ. Cisplatin Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation via Inhibition of Nonhomologous End Joining. Mol Cancer Res. 2005 May 1;3(5):277–85. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-04-0032 Google Scholar
[5]
5. Bañuelos CA, Banáth JP, Kim JY, Aquino-Parsons C, Olive PL. γH2AX Expression in Tumors Exposed to Cisplatin and Fractionated Irradiation. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 May 18;15(10):3344–53. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3114 Google Scholar
[6]
6. Qian W, Nishikawa M, Haque AMd, Hirose M, Mashimo M, Sato E, et al. Mitochondrial density determines the cellular sensitivity to cisplatin-induced cell death. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol. 2005 Dec;289(6):C1466–75. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00265.2005 Google Scholar
[7]
7. Cervical Cancer Prognosis and Survival Rates - NCI [pdqCancerInfoSummary] [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2026 May 17]. Located at: nciglobal,ncienterprise. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/types/cervical/survival Google Scholar
[8]
8. Induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy versus standard chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (GCIG INTERLACE): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial - The Lancet [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 17]. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01438-7/fulltext. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01438-7 Google Scholar
[9]
9. McCormack M, Kadalayil L, Hackshaw A, Hall-Craggs MA, Symonds RP, Warwick V, et al. A phase II study of weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2464–9. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.230 PubMed PMID: 23695016; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3694233. Google Scholar
[10]
10. Homenta C, Kurniadi A, Winarno GNA, Santiana L, Utama MS. Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Int J Womens Health. 2026 Mar 13;18:580324. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S580324 PubMed PMID: 41853672; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12994395. Google Scholar