Articles Vol. 67 No. 9 24/09/2026

FEASIBILITY, SUCCESS RATE AND COMPLICATIONS OF THE ANGIO-SEAL VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE AFTER TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION (TACE) VIA FEMORAL ARTERIAL ACCESS AT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HO CHI MINH CITY

Le Quang Nhut, Tran Hoa, Nguyen Quang Thai Duong, Dang Quoc Viet, Tran Doan Khac Viet, Tran Van Duc, Lam Minh Khanh Hoang, Hap Tien Hai, Tran Anh Tuan, Nguyen Minh Dat
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i9.6617
15 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe the feasibility, success rate, and complications of Angio-Seal use following transfemoral transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) at University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City.

Methods: This prospective single-arm observational study included 84 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent TACE via femoral arterial access with Angio-Seal closure from September 2025 to April 2026. The puncture site was assessed 3 hours after the procedure and hourly thereafter if complete hemostasis had not yet been achieved. All patients underwent 1-month follow-up with CT angiography of the vascular access site.

Results: The mean age was 62.7 ± 13.3 years, and 82.1% of patients were male. Technical success and post-deployment hemostatic success were both 100% (95% CI: 95.7–100%). The median time to complete hemostasis and ambulation was 4 hours (IQR: 3–6), with 59/84 patients achieving both outcomes within 4 hours. No access-site complications were observed (95% CI: 0–4.3%). Poisson regression with robust variance showed that each 1-unit increase in INR (RR=3.70; 95% CI: 2.28–6.01; p<0.001) and each 10-minute increase in procedure time (RR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.09–1.52; p=0.002) were independently associated with delayed complete hemostasis and ambulation.

Conclusion: Angio-Seal demonstrated high technical and hemostatic success in the study cohort. The findings regarding complications should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size and the absence of a comparison group.

References
[1]
1. Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1922-1965. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466. Google Scholar
[2]
2. Redfors B, Watson BM, McAndrew T, et al. Mortality, length of stay, and cost implications of procedural bleeding after percutaneous interventions using large-bore catheters. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(7):798-802. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0265. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Oneissi M, Sweid A, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Access-site complications in transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: a systematic review of incidence rates and management strategies. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;19(4):353-363. doi:10.1093/ons/opaa096. Google Scholar
[4]
4. Pang N, Gao J, Zhang B, et al. Vascular closure devices versus manual compression in cardiac interventional procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ther. 2022;2022:8569188. doi:10.1155/2022/8569188. Google Scholar
[5]
5. Zhou L, Zhang LZ, Wang JY, et al. Perioperative safety analysis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with preprocedural leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7(3):435-442. doi:10.3892/mco.2017.1345. Google Scholar
[6]
6. Hieb RA, Neisen MJ, Hohenwalter EJ, et al. Safety and effectiveness of repeat arterial closure using the AngioSeal device in patients with hepatic malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(12):1704-1708. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.09.003. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Nguyễn Văn Ngọc, Phan Tuấn Đạt, Phạm Thị Hồng Thi, et al. Kết quả chăm sóc đường vào động mạch đùi đã được đóng mạch bằng dụng cụ sau can thiệp động mạch vành qua da tại Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam. 2024;(108):74-81. doi:10.58354/jvc.108.2024.821. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Essibayi MA, Cloft H, Savastano LE, Brinjikji W. Safety and efficacy of Angio-Seal device for transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interv Neuroradiol. 2021;27(5):703-711. doi:10.1177/1591019921996100. Google Scholar
[9]
9. Yokoyama T, Hamasuna R, Ohta H, Takeshima H. Risk factors for puncture site complications using the Angio-Seal closure device in endovascular therapy: a single-center analysis. J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2020;14(2):48-55. doi:10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0060. Google Scholar
[10]
10. Aida Y, Misaki K, Kamide T, et al. Physical risk factors of hemorrhagic complications associated with Angio-Seal closure device use in neurointerventional procedures. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:e850-e855. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.179. Google Scholar