Articles Vol. 64 No. 3 24/04/2023

24. ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR RECTAL CANCER IN THAI BINH PROVINCE'S GENERAL HOSPITAL

Tran Thai Phuc1,2, Do Manh Toan3,4, Le Anh Minh1,2
1 Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Trường Đại học Y Dược Thái Bình
3 Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital
4 Bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh Thái Bình
Corresponding author: phuctbmu@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v64i3.660
13 Views
7 Downloads
Keywords
Rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery to treat rectal cancer has been indicated at Thai Binh Provincial
General Hospital In recent years. The study evaluated the outcome of this surgery.
Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study, 59 rectal cancer patients had laparoscopic surgery
at Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital from January 2019 to June 2021. Record data on age,
sex, tumor characteristics, cancer stage, operation time, complications and surgical complications;
Survival rate, recurrence rate, survival time and quality of life after surgery.
Results: 59 rectal cancer patients had laparoscopic surgery. The mean age was 65.7 years old. Male
44.1% and female 55.9%. Hight 35.6%; Middle 30.5% and 33.9%. Stage I, II and III are equivalent
to 3.4; 22.0% and 74.6%. 100% patients are carcinoma. Rectal amputation 28.8%; anal sphincter
preservation 71.2%. 100% colorectal anastomosis by stapler. The average surgery time was 199.3
minutes. complication rate was 1.7%; Fistula anastomosis 3.3%. The mean follow-up time after
surgery was 17.8 months. The average number of bowel movements 1 year after surgery was 2.6
times. Decrease and loss of sexual function 45.5%. 78.0% good urinary function. The function of anal
autonomy according to Kirwan standards I, II and III are equivalent 65.9; 24.4 and 9.8%. Recurrence
6,8%. The survival rate is 94.9%. Overall and disease-free survival was 30.1 and 32.5 months.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic of rectal cancer at Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital is a safe method
with good results.

References
[1]
Morneau M, Boulanger J, Charlebois P et Google Scholar
[2]
al., Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the Google Scholar
[3]
treatment of colorectal cancer: a literature Google Scholar
[4]
review and recommendations from the Comité Google Scholar
[5]
de l’évolution des pratiques en oncologie. Can Google Scholar
[6]
J Surg. 2013;56(5):297-310. doi:10.1503/ Google Scholar
[7]
cjs.005512, 2013. Google Scholar
[8]
Jessup JM, Goldberg RM, Asareet EA et al., Google Scholar
[9]
“Colon and rectum”, AJCC (American Joint Google Scholar
[10]
Committee on Cancer) Cancer Staging Manual, Google Scholar
[11]
th ed, Springer New York, pp. 251-274, 2017. Google Scholar
[12]
Yang SY, Kang JH et al., Operative safety and Google Scholar
[13]
oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer based on Google Scholar
[14]
the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation: a Google Scholar
[15]
stratified analysis of a large Korean cohort. Ann Google Scholar
[16]
Surg Treat Res.; 97(5), 254–260, 2019. Google Scholar
[17]
Rosenberg R, Maak M, Schuster T et al., Does a Google Scholar
[18]
rectal cancer of the upper third behave more like Google Scholar
[19]
a colon or a rectal cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum.; Google Scholar
[20]
(5): 761–770, 2010. Google Scholar
[21]
Mai Đình Điểu, “Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu Google Scholar
[22]
thuật nội soi trong điều trị ung thư trực tràng”. Google Scholar
[23]
Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học, Trường Đại học Y Dược Google Scholar
[24]
Huế, 2013. Google Scholar
[25]
Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G et al., Google Scholar
[26]
“Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a Google Scholar
[27]
consecutive series of 100 patients”. Annals of Google Scholar
[28]
surgery. 237 (3). 335-42, 2003. Google Scholar
[29]
Trần Thái Phúc, “Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu Google Scholar
[30]
thuật nội soi điều trị ung thư trực tràng thấp tại Google Scholar
[31]
Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108”. Luận án Google Scholar
[32]
Tiến sĩ Y học, Viện Nghiên cứu khoa học Y dược Google Scholar
[33]
lâm sàng 108, 2018. Google Scholar
[34]
Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H et al., Google Scholar
[35]
“Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of Google Scholar
[36]
rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery”. Google Scholar
[37]
Surgical endoscopy. 23 (1). 113-8, 2009. Google Scholar
[38]
Farhat W, Azzaza M, Mizouni A et al., Factors Google Scholar
[39]
predicting recurrence after curative resection Google Scholar
[40]
for rectal cancer: a 16-year study. World J Surg Google Scholar
[41]
Oncol.; 17(1), 173, 2019. Google Scholar
[42]
Trần Thành Long, Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật Google Scholar
[43]
nội soi cắt đoạn trực tràng và vét hạch điều trị ung Google Scholar
[44]
thư biểu mô tuyến trực tràng cao tại Bệnh viện K Google Scholar
[45]
năm 2016 - 2018. Luận án bác sĩ chuyên khoa cấp Google Scholar
[46]
II, Trường đại học Y Hà Nội, 2020. Google Scholar
[47]
Kim JH, Noh TI, Oh MM et al., “Voiding Google Scholar
[48]
dysfunction after total mesorectal excision Google Scholar
[49]
in rectal cancer”. International neurourology Google Scholar
[50]
journal. 15 (3). 166-71, 2011. Google Scholar
[51]
Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Küchler T et al., Google Scholar
[52]
“Prospective evaluation of quality of life of Google Scholar
[53]
patients receiving either abdominoperineal Google Scholar
[54]
resection or sphincter-preserving procedure for Google Scholar
[55]
rectal cancer”. Annals of surgical oncology. 12 Google Scholar
[56]
(2). 117-23, 2005. Google Scholar