Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ14-HNKH Hội Hóa sinh Y học Việt Nam 17/09/2026

DISTRIBUTION AND ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF STREPTOCOCCUS SPP. ISOLATED FROM PATIENTS AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 103 FROM JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2025

Nguyen Van An, Hoang Xuan Quang, Dinh Viet Hung, Hoang Trung Kien, Le Huy Hoang
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD14.6563
1 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: Describe the distribution characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility of the Streptococcus spp. strains isolated from patients at Military Hospital 103 from January to December 2025.

Subjects and Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on strains of Streptococcus spp. isolated from patients at Military Hospital 103.

Results: A total of 66 strains of pathogenic Streptococcus spp. were isolated from patients at Military Hospital 103 in 2025. Streptococcus agalactiae (31.8%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.2%), and Streptococcus anginosus (9.1%) were the three species with the highest proportion. Streptococcus spp. was isolated primarily from patients aged 40 years or older (89.4%) and from surgical departments (39.4%). Isolation rates of Streptococcus spp. were most prevalent in blood, urine, and body fluid samples, ranging from 22.7-25.8%. Streptococcus spp. showed the highest resistance rates to Erythromycin (75.6%), Clindamycin (73.4%), and Tetracycline (72.6%). Conversely, these bacteria were completely susceptible to Tigecyclin, Linezolid, and Vancomycin. Furthermore, strains isolated from non-sterile fluids had higher antibiotic resistance rates than strains isolated from sterile fluids.

Conclusions: Streptococcus spp. primarily causes disease in patients ≥ 40 years of age, including: S.agalactiae, S.pneumoniae, and S. anginosus. These are the streptococcal species that were isolated at the highest rates. Streptococcus spp. has the highest resistance rates to Erythromycin, Clindamycin, and Tetracycline. However, this bacterium remains completely susceptible to Tigecyclin, Linezolid, and Vancomycin.

References
[1]
[1] Collaborators G.B.D.A.R. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 2022, 400 (10369): 2221-2248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7 Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Guo Y, Ding L, Han R et al. Antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical isolates from hospitals across China: CHINET 2024 surveillance report. One Health Adv, 2025, 3, 23. Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Assafi M.S. Frequency and antibiogram of Streptococcus spp. isolated from different specimens: three years of study. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand), 2023, 69 (4): 24-30. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2023.69.4.4 Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Leber A.L.E. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook (5th ed.). American Society for Microbiology, 2023. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (M100), 35 ed, 2025. Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Gergova R, Boyanov V, Muhtarova A et al. A review of the impact of streptococcal infections and antimicrobial resistance on human health. Antibiotics (Basel), 2024, 13 (4): 360. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040360 Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Nguyễn Văn An, Nguyễn Văn Đức, Lê Hạ Long Hải. Phân bố các chủng vi khuẩn Gram dương thường gặp tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh năm 2023. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2024, 541 (2) : 219-223. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v541i2.10773 Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Nguyen Van An, Le Huy Hoang, Le Ha Long Hai et al. Distribution and antibiotic resistance characteristics of bacteria isolated from blood culture in a teaching hospital in Vietnam during 2014-2021. Infection and Drug Resistance, 2023, 16: 1677-1692. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S402278. Google Scholar