Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ13-HNKH Bệnh viện 19-8 18/09/2026

PREVALENCE OF DISTANCE AND NEAR PHORIA AMONG MILITARY MEDICAL ACADEMY STUDENTS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS

Nguyen Le Trung, Nguyen Yen Linh, Le Minh Khoa, Phan Nhat Duy, Vo Nhu Anh, Nguyen Le Chi Vi
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD13.6555
9 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of heterophoria at distance and near and to analyze associated factors among students of the Vietnam Military Medical University (VMMU).

Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 261 students. All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity testing, refraction, and heterophoria evaluation at distance and near. Heterophoria was primarily detected using the alternate cover test. Associated factors investigated included refractive errors, duration of electronic device use, academic year, and ocular symptoms. Data were analyzed using STATA software with appropriate statistical tests and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: The prevalence of distance heterophoria was 18.01%, with exophoria predominating (17.24%) and esophoria accounting for a small proportion (0.77%). At near fixation, the prevalence of heterophoria increased to 45.59%, mainly exophoria (44.06%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified refractive errors and headache/eye-strain symptoms as independent risk factors.

Conclusion: Heterophoria, particularly near exophoria, was relatively common among students of the Vietnam Military Medical University. This condition was closely associated with refractive errors, headache, and eye strain symptoms.

References
[1]
1.Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders. 2008: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar
[2]
2.Wajuihian SO. Prevalence of heterophoria and its association with near fusional vergence ranges and refractive errors. African Vision and Eye Health. 2018;77(1):1-9. Google Scholar
[3]
3.Porcar E, Martinez-Palomera A. Prevalence of general binocular dysfunctions in a population of university students. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(2):111-3. Google Scholar
[4]
4.Cai J, et al. Frequency and associated factors of accommodation and non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction among medical university students. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2024;17(2):374. Google Scholar
[5]
5.Shrestha P, Kaiti R. Non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction among the medical students of a teaching hospital: A descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2022;60(252):693. Google Scholar
[6]
6.Moravej R, et al. Binocular vision disorders and refractive errors on university students' quality of life. Int J Ophthalmol. 2025;18(4):707-715. Google Scholar
[7]
7.Wu LJ, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of myopia in high-school students in Beijing. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0120764. Google Scholar
[8]
8.Nguyễn LT, et al. Thực trạng và mối liên quan giữa chất lượng giấc ngủ ở học viên Học viện Quân y. Tạp chí Y Dược học Quân sự. 2025;50(si4):332-341. Google Scholar