Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ13-HNKH Bệnh viện 19-8 09/09/2026

Customized CAD/CAM BioHPP Hybrid Membrane with Integrated Abutment for Guided Bone Regeneration and Immediate Implant Placement: A Prospective Case Series of 28 Patients

Tran Tuan Anh1,2, Nguyen Thi Hoai Nhi3,4, Tran Bao Anh5,6, Tran Hoang Anh7,8, Luong Tan Do9,10
1 Vo Truong Toan University
2 Đại học Võ Trường Toản
3 Medic Binh Duong General Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Medic Bình Dương
5 Hi.Dent Dental Clinic
6 Nha khoa Hi.Dent
7 Binh Duong General Hospital
8 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Bình Dương
9 An Phu Ward Health Station
10 Trạm Y Tế Phường An Phú
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD13.6525
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of a CAD/CAM-designed BioHPP hybrid membrane with an integrated abutment in guided bone regeneration (GBR) combined with immediate implant restoration.

Materials and Methods: A prospective case series included 28 partially or fully edentulous patients treated with implant placement and a CAD/CAM-designed BioHPP membrane. Success criteria were implant stability test (IST) >65, absence of infection, and no significant marginal bone loss. Aesthetic outcomes, masticatory function, oral hygiene, and complications were evaluated over 6 months. Data were analyzed using 95% confidence intervals.  Results: The overall success rate was 96.4% (27/28 cases; 95% CI: 82.3–99.4%). One failure (3.6%) was associated with peri-implant infection and mild bone loss. Good aesthetic outcomes, masticatory function, and oral hygiene were achieved in 89.3%, 92.9%, and 85.7% of patients, respectively. Membrane exposure occurred in 7.1% of cases and was significantly associated with poor oral hygiene (p = 0.003). No implant rejection or material-related adverse reactions were observed.  Conclusion: The CAD/CAM-designed BioHPP hybrid membrane with an integrated abutment is a promising approach for GBR with immediate implant restoration, providing high clinical success and low complication rates after 6 months.

References
[1]
. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44 Suppl 18:S7–S21. Google Scholar
[2]
.Urban IA, Monje A, Nevins M, et al. Principles for vertical ridge augmentation in the atrophic posterior mandible: A technical review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(5):639-645. Google Scholar
[3]
. Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Annunziata M, et al. Titanium mesh in guided bone regeneration: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(1):e23-e35. Google Scholar
[4]
. Shi Y, et al. Customized barrier membrane (titanium alloy, poly ether-ether ketone and unsintered hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide) for guided bone regeneration. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(13):4562. Google Scholar
[5]
. Scribante A, et al. Full-digital customized meshes in guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prosthesis. 2023;5(2):333-348. Google Scholar
[6]
. Schwitalla AD, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: A review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(6):743-749. Google Scholar
[7]
. Briguglio F, et al. The use of titanium mesh in guided bone regeneration: A systematic review. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:9065423. Google Scholar