Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ14-HNKH Hội Hóa sinh Y học Việt Nam 19/09/2026

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF AN AUTOMATED RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY–MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS

Chau Van Ket, Do Tuan Kiet, Trinh Minh Viet
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD14.6491
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To develop a machine learning model integrated with Raman spectroscopy for the rapid quantification of potassium acetate in preservation solutions.

Methods: The study was conducted using a LabRam Soleil Raman spectrometer (532 nm) and a dataset comprising 240 Raman spectra obtained from potassium acetate/glycerol samples. The data were divided into training, validation, and test sets. Five-fold cross-validation and Grid Search were applied for hyperparameter optimization. Four models (MLR, PCR, PLS, and ANN) were developed and evaluated using R², RMSE, and MAPE. Model performance was further compared with potentiometric titration using 10 real-world samples.

Results: The PLS model with six latent variables achieved the best overall performance (R² = 0.9991, RMSE = 0.52%, and MAPE = 1.24%), with a training time of 2.5 seconds and high interpretability. The automated workflow reduced analysis time by 85% and enabled the processing of 96 samples per day. A strong correlation was observed between the PLS-Raman method and potentiometric titration (r = 0.985, p < 0.001), demonstrating high specificity for potassium acetate determination.

Conclusion: The Raman-PLS system provides a rapid, accurate, and reliable analytical tool with strong potential for quality control of biological sample preservation solutions.

References
[1]
1. Smith E, Dent G. Modern Raman Spectroscopy: A Practical Approach. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2019. Google Scholar
[2]
2. McCreery RL. Raman Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Lussier F, Thibault V, Charron B, et al. Deep learning for biomedical Raman spectroscopy: a review. Analyst. 2024;149(8):2145-2167. doi:10.1039/D3AN01113B. Google Scholar
[4]
4. Liao S, Huang J, Liu C, et al. Machine Learning-Assisted Quantification of Biomarkers Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2025;97(1):100-108. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02456. Google Scholar
[5]
5. Xu Y, Li L, Shen A, et al. Intelligent baseline correction for Raman spectroscopy via deep learning-based parameter optimization. Talanta. 2026;260:124890. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2026.124890. Google Scholar
[6]
6. Zhang ZM, Chen S, Liang YZ. Baseline correction using adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares. Analyst. 2010;135(5):1138-1146. doi:10.1039/b922045c. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Silva CS, Pimentel MF. Review of model transfer strategies in near-infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Microchem J. 2024;199:109980. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2024.109980. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Lê Minh T, Phạm Văn H. Phương pháp phân tích và kiểm nghiệm dược phẩm. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2021. Google Scholar
[9]
9. Valderrey V, Perez M, Rodriguez L. Application of Raman Spectroscopy Coupled With Chemometrics for the Detection and Quantification of Pesticide Residues. ChemistryEurope. 2025;3(2):e202400120. doi:10.1002/chem.202400120. Google Scholar
[10]
10. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R2). Geneva: ICH; 2024. Google Scholar