Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ14-HNKH Hội Hóa sinh Y học Việt Nam 19/09/2026

RELIABILITY OF THE IMAGE-BASED SAMPLE CHECK MODULE ON THE COBAS 8100 SYSTEM IN DETECTING HAEMOLYSIS, ICTERUS AND LIPAEMIA

Dao Huyen Quyen, Nguyen Thi Mai Phuong
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD14.6488
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of the image-based sample check module on the cobas 8100 system in detecting haemolysis, icterus and lipaemia, using the quantitative serum index assay as the reference standard.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 334 serum and plasma samples analysed on the cobas 8100 system at the Department of Biochemistry, Bach Mai Hospital. Each sample was simultaneously classified by colour on the acquired image and quantified for the three serum indices; sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and the kappa coefficient were calculated at three sets of reference thresholds.

Results: For haemolysis, both specificity and positive predictive value reached 100%, and sensitivity rose from 45.2% at an H index threshold of 20 to 100% at an H index threshold of 80. For lipaemia, 29.0% of samples were flagged, yet the L index did not differ from that of unflagged samples (p = 0.317), with sensitivity of 50.0% and 64.3% at L index thresholds of 30 and 50, respectively; for icterus, sensitivity was only 2.5%. Using the manufacturer thresholds, any colour alert achieved 84.2% sensitivity, 98.6% negative predictive value, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 and missed 3 of 334 samples. Overall agreement between the two methods was 67.1%, with a kappa of 0.194.

Conclusion: Image-based sample classification is highly specific for haemolysis and detected all haemolysed samples above the interference threshold, but it is not sufficiently reliable for icterus and lipaemia.

References
[1]
1. Nordin N., Ab Rahim S.N., Wan Omar W.F.A. và cộng sự. Preanalytical errors in clinical laboratory testing at a glance: source and control measures. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e57243. doi:10.7759/cureus.57243. Google Scholar
[2]
2. Simundic A.M., Baird G., Cadamuro J. và cộng sự. Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. 2020;57(1):1-21. doi:10.1080/10408363.2019.1664391. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Getahun T., Kebede A., Alemu S. và cộng sự. Evaluation of visual serum indices measurements and potential false result risks in routine clinical chemistry tests. eJIFCC. 2019;30(3):276-287. Google Scholar
[4]
4. Farrell C.J.L., Carter A.C. Serum indices: managing assay interference. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 2016;53(5):527-538. doi:10.1177/0004563216643557. Google Scholar
[5]
5. Roche Diagnostics. Serum Index Gen.2 - Hướng dẫn sử dụng thuốc thử cobas c 701/702, phiên bản V4.0. Mannheim: Roche Diagnostics GmbH; 2014. Google Scholar
[6]
6. Roche Diagnostics. cobas 8100 automated workflow series - Operator’s Manual, phiên bản 2.9.3: Sample Check Module. Mannheim: Roche Diagnostics GmbH; 2016. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Man D., Wang H., Zhang X. và cộng sự. Research on the development of image-based Deep Learning model for serum quality recognition. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2025;63(7):e179-e183. doi:10.1515/cclm-2024-1219. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Yang C., Li D., Sun D. và cộng sự. A deep learning-based system for assessment of serum quality using sample images. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2022;531:254-260. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2022.04.010. Google Scholar
[9]
9. Lippi G., Cadamuro J., Danese E. và cộng sự. Internal quality assurance of HIL indices on Roche Cobas c702. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200088. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200088. Google Scholar
[10]
10. Wang H., Wang H., Zhang J. và cộng sự. Using machine learning to develop an autoverification system in a clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2021;59(5):883-891. doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-0716. Google Scholar