Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ14-HNKH Hội Hóa sinh Y học Việt Nam 19/09/2026

EVALUATION OF THE FETAL MEDICINE FOUNDATION (FMF) PREECLAMPSIA SCREENING MODEL INCORPORATING PLACENTAL GROWTH FACTOR (PLGF) AT QUANG NINH OBSTETRICS AND PEDIATRICS HOSPITAL

Nguyen Thi Thuong, Bui Minh Cuong, Truong Huu Cuong, Do Quynh Hoa
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD14.6474
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening model, incorporating placental growth factor (PlGF), is recommended for the early identification of women at risk of preeclampsia during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the FMF preeclampsia screening model incorporating PlGF at Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital.

Methods: A prospective descriptive longitudinal study was conducted on 1,187 singleton pregnancies at 11 weeks 3 days to 13 weeks 6 days of gestation, screened using the FMF model between November 2023 and December 2025. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and odds ratios (ORs).

Results: The high-risk group had significantly lower PlGF concentrations and PlGF multiples of the median (MoM) than the low-risk group (p < 0.001). The AUCs of PlGF and PlGF MoM were 0.74 and 0.77, respectively. A PlGF level ≤44.55 pg/mL or a PlGF MoM ≤0.73 was associated with a 7.13-fold and 7.12-fold increase, respectively, in the likelihood of belonging to the high-risk group (p < 0.001). The combined model incorporating mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), and PlGF achieved the highest predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.891.

Conclusion: PlGF is a valuable biomarker for early preeclampsia risk screening using the FMF model. Combining PlGF with MAP and UtA-PI improves risk stratification and enhances the prediction of preeclampsia during the first trimester of pregnancy.

References
[1]
[1] Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S1. Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, et al. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2017;135(8):799–812. Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753. Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Wright D, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, et al. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and biomarkers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):62.e1–62.e10. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn sàng lọc và điều trị dự phòng TSG. Quyết định số 1911/QĐ-BYT ngày 19/4/2021. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2021. Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn sàng lọc, chẩn đoán và xử trí tăng huyết áp ở phụ nữ mang thai, TSG và sản giật. Quyết định số 1154/QĐ-BYT ngày 04/5/2024. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2024. Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Poon LC, Kametas NA, Pandeva I, Valencia C, Nicolaides KH. Mean arterial pressure at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Hypertension. 2009;53(5):812–818 Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Melchiorre K, Wormald B, Leslie K, et al. Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):613–620. Google Scholar
[9]
[9] Poon LC, Akolekar R, Lachmann R, et al. Maternal serum PLGF in prediction of preeclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(2):135–141. Google Scholar