Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ14-HNKH Hội Hóa sinh Y học Việt Nam 18/09/2026

OPTIMIZING NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER FIBROSIS SEVERITY USING PRO-C3/ADAPT INDEX IN PATIENTS WITH MASLD

Pham Ngoc Thien
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD14.6447
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To review the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive liver fibrosis assessment using the PRO-C3 biomarker and the ADAPT algorithm in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

Methods: Literature and clinical studies from major international guidelines (EASL 2024, APASL 2025) and multicenter clinical validation trials were synthesized to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PRO-C3 and the ADAPT algorithm compared to liver biopsy and other non-invasive tests.

Results: PRO-C3 directly measures active fibrogenesis by quantifying the N-terminal propeptide of type III collagen cleaved by disease-specific N-protease. The ADAPT algorithm integrates four accessible inputs: PRO-C3, patient age, diabetes status, and platelet count. In a European multicenter validation cohort (n = 683), the ADAPT algorithm achieved superior area under the curve (AUC) compared to PRO-C3 alone: 74.3% for significant fibrosis (F2-F4), 80.3% for advanced fibrosis (F3-F4), and 85.4% for cirrhosis (F4). Leveraging a high specificity strategy (ranging from 80.4% to 90.0% at corresponding cut-offs of 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0), ADAPT effectively minimizes false positive rates associated with initial screening markers such as FIB-4.

Conclusion: The PRO-C3 biomarker integrated into the ADAPT algorithm represents an advanced and highly specific non-invasive tool for staging liver fibrosis in MASLD. It provides a reliable second-step screening solution that optimizes clinical resources and prevents unnecessary transient elastography (VCTE) referrals.

References
[1]
[1] European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). J Hepatol. 2024 Sep;81(3):492-542. Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):328-357. Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Chan WK, Chuah KH, Rajaram RB, et al. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-the-Art Review. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2023 Sep 30;32(3):197-213. Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Verzijl CRC, Van De Peppel IP, Struik D, et al. Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036): an investigational PEGylated fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2020 Feb;29(2):125-133. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Daniels SJ, Leeming DJ, Eslam M, et al. ADAPT: An Algorithm Incorporating PRO-C3 Accurately Identifies Patients With NAFLD and Advanced Fibrosis. Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1075-1086. Google Scholar
[6]
[6] Seth SC, Sanjiv. Epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. UpToDate. 2022. Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Ilagan-Ying YC, Banini BA, Do A, et al. Screening, Diagnosis, and Staging of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Application of Society Guidelines to Clinical Practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023 Oct;25(10):213-224. Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, et al. Prospective Study of Outcomes in Adults with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1559-1569. Google Scholar
[9]
[9] Nielsen MJ, Nedergaard AF, Sun S, Veidal SS, et al. The neo-epitope specific PRO-C3 ELISA measures true formation of type III collagen associated with liver and muscle parameters. Am J Transl Res. 2013 Apr 19;5(3):303-315. Google Scholar
[10]
[10] Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology. 2023 Dec 1;78(6):1966-1986. Google Scholar