Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ13-HNKH Bệnh viện 19-8 10/09/2026

OUTCOMES OF CARE AND REHABILITATION IN PATIENTS AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ACL RECONSTRUCTION AT 19-8 HOSPITAL, MINISTRY OF PUBLIC SECURITY

Xuân Bùi Thị Thanh, Vinh Vũ Văn, Sơn Đỗ Việt, Đức Nguyễn Anh, Sơn Nguyễn Thái, Dũng Hồ Tuấn, Chí Đỗ Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD13.6424
0 Views
0 Downloads
Keywords
ACL, ACL reconstruction, rehabilitation…
Abstract

Objective: To assess the outcomes of postoperative care and knee rehabilitation following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction at 19-8 Hospital, Ministry of Public Security. Material and Methods: A retrospective and prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction at the Department of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, 19-8 Hospital. Patient demographics, causes of injury, postoperative complications, and functional recovery were evaluated. Results: Of the 86 patients included, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Sports-related trauma was identified as the leading cause of injury. No postoperative complications were observed. Functional assessment revealed that 97.7% of patients achieved recovery, characterized by restored knee stability, complete range of motion, and absence of pain during activity. Conclusion:Postoperative care and rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction at 19-8 Hospital demonstrated favorable outcomes, with 97.7% of patients achieving good functional recovery. Early detection and treatment of sports-related injuries, together with enhanced nursing care, are essential to further improve clinical outcomes.

References
[1]
1. Nguyễn Thành Chơn (2022). Phẫu thuật tái tạo dây chằng chéo trước giai đoạn sớm - so sánh kết quả với phẫu thuật giai đoạn muộn. Tạp Chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 160(12V1), 214-219. doi: 10.52852/tcncyh.v160i12V1.1187 Google Scholar
[2]
2. Đỗ Xuân Hợp (1976), Giải phẫu thực dụng ngoại khoa chi trên - dưới, Nhà xuất bản y học, trang 269 - 279; 310-313; 323-331. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Đoàn Anh Tuấn (2023). Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi tái tạo dây chằng chéo trước bằng kỹ thuật All-inside sử dụng mảnh ghép gân Hamstring tự thân tại bệnh viện đa khoa Đông Anh, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, Số 527, tr.1-4. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v527i2.5832 Google Scholar
[4]
4. Baer G.S., Harner C.D. (2007). Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 26 (4), 661-81. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.010 Google Scholar
[5]
5. Noyes F.R., Barber-Westin S.D. (2014). Neuromuscular retraining intervention programs: do they reduce noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury rates in adolescent female athletes? Arthroscopy. 30 (2), 245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.003 Google Scholar
[6]
6. Rose T, Engel T, Bernhard J, Hepp P, Josten C, Lill H (2004). Differences in the rehabilitation period following two method of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs ligament patellar, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrose, May 12(3), pp. 189- 197. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0438-8 Google Scholar
[7]
7. Sabrina Mendes Turck, Marcelo Faria Silva et al (2025). Using the Single-Leg Hop Test to Determine Knee Extension Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Orthop J Sports Med, Apr 4; 13(4). doi: 10.1177/23259671241303520 Google Scholar
[8]
8. Tegner, Yelverton, and Jack Lysholm (1985). Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, No 198, pg.43-49. Google Scholar