Objectives: To describe pain intensity during endotracheal suctioning, repositioning, and oral care using the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), and to explore associated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study included 145 mechanically ventilated patients at the Department of Intensive Care and Clinical Toxicology, 19-8 Hospital (Dec 2024–Sep 2025). Each patient was assessed once for each procedure, yielding 435 assessments; each procedure was analyzed separately in 145 patients. BPS was recorded during the procedure, and BPS ≥7 indicated at least moderate pain. Spearman correlation and Mann–Whitney tests were used. Comparisons in Table 3.5 were considered exploratory univariable analyses and were checked using Holm adjustment. Results: The prevalence of BPS ≥7 was 77.9% during suctioning, 51.7% during repositioning, and 26.9% during oral care. RASS correlated positively with BPS across all procedures (rho = 0.31–0.35; p<0.001). Several univariable differences by sex, diagnosis, airway type, and sedation/analgesia had raw p values <0.05; these differences did not remain statistically significant after Holm adjustment and were treated as trends requiring confirmation. Conclusions: In this sample, BPS ≥7 was most frequently observed during suctioning. The association between RASS and BPS was consistent; subgroup trends may help identify patients who warrant closer pain assessment but do not establish independent associations or treatment effects.
ASSESSING PROCEDURAL PAIN IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF INTENSIVE CARE AND CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 19-8 HOSPITAL
0
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
procedural pain; BPS; mechanical ventilation; ICU; sedation–analgesia; nursing.
Abstract
References
[1]
1. Nguyễn Thị Kiều Trang, Hoàng Bùi Hải, Nguyễn Thị Sơn, Đàm Thị Hương Lan, Đinh Thị Thanh Huệ. Đánh giá tình trạng đau bằng thang điểm đánh giá mức độ đau dựa trên hành vi (BPS) trong chăm sóc người bệnh thở máy xâm nhập. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025;546(3):107–111. doi:10.51298/vmj.v546i3.12706.
Google Scholar
[2]
2. Hoàng Thị Thu Thanh, Nguyễn Văn Chinh, Huỳnh Thị Phượng, Nguyễn Thị Thanh Tâm, Nguyễn Thị Như Mai, Phạm Thị Thu Hằng, Lê Thị Hoàn, Phạm Thị Nhã Phương, Ka Thơm, Trần Thị Phương Dung. Đánh giá mức độ đau khi thực hiện thủ thuật của người bệnh thở máy tại Khoa Hồi sức Ngoại thần kinh, Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024;543(3):216–220. doi:10.51298/vmj.v543i3.11557.
Google Scholar
[3]
3. Dương Minh Đức, Chu Văn Long, Nguyễn Anh Tuấn, Phạm Thị Ngọc. Đánh giá mức độ đau bằng thang điểm CPOT trên người bệnh thở máy tại Khoa Nội – Hồi sức Thần kinh, Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức. Tạp chí Điều dưỡng Việt Nam. 2021:46–52.
Google Scholar
[4]
4. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825–e873. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
Google Scholar
[5]
5. Rijkenberg S, Stilma W, Endeman H, Bosman RJ, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):167–172. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.007.
Google Scholar
[6]
6. Wojnar-Gruszka K, Sega A, Płaszewska-Żywko L, Wojtan S, Potocka M, Kózka M. Pain assessment with the BPS and CCPOT behavioral pain scales in mechanically ventilated patients requiring analgesia and sedation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10894. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710894.
Google Scholar
[7]
7. Ayasrah SM. Pain among non-verbal critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: prevalence, correlates and predictors. J Crit Care. 2019;49:14–20. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.002.
Google Scholar