Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ13-HNKH Bệnh viện 19-8 10/09/2026

ASSESSMENT OF NURSING CARE INTENSITY USING THE NURSING ACTIVITIES SCORE AND PATIENT-TO-NURSE RATIO BY SHIFT AT THE INTENSIVE CARE AND POISON CONTROL DEPARTMENT, 19-8 HOSPITAL, MINISTRY OF PUBLIC SECURITY

Hằng Vũ Thị, Hoàng Nguyễn Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD13.6416
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe nursing care intensity using the Nursing Activities Score (NAS), the patient-to-nurse ratio by shift, and mean NAS according to selected clinical factors at the Intensive Care and Poison Control Department, 19-8 Hospital, Ministry of Public Security.

Methods: A prospective descriptive study with repeated cross-sectional assessments was completed from January to May 2026. Three non-consecutive observation days were selected each month, including two working days and one weekend or holiday, resulting in 15 observation days. All eligible patient-days were assessed using NAS over a 24-hour cycle. Patient numbers and direct-care nurses were recorded during administrative and on-duty/off-hour periods. The study included 361 patient-days and 30 shift-level observations. Clinical-factor comparisons were exploratory and were not interpreted causally.

Results: The mean number of patients per observation day was 24.1 ± 1.3. Mean NAS was 69.8 ± 17.6 points per patient-day (95% CI: 68.0-71.6); 106/361 patient-days (29.4%; 95% CI: 24.9-34.3) had NAS ≥ 80. The mean patient-to-nurse ratio was 2.7 ± 0.3 during administrative periods (95% CI: 2.5-2.9) and 6.4 ± 0.7 during on-duty/off-hour periods (95% CI: 6.0-6.8). Thirteen of 15 on-duty/off-hour observations (86.7%; 95% CI: 62.1-96.3) had a ratio of at least six patients per nurse. Mean NAS was higher among patient-days involving mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, renal replacement therapy, an artificial airway, or at least two intensive care interventions (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The study documented substantial nursing care requirements and a clear difference in patient-to-nurse ratios between work periods. These descriptive findings may support internal review of care organization; they are insufficient to establish staffing inadequacy or causal effects on patient outcomes.

References
[1]
1. Miranda DR, Nap R, de Rijk A, Schaufeli W, Iapichino G. Nursing Activities Score. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(2):374-382. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000045567.78801.CC. Google Scholar
[2]
2. Padilha KG, Stafseth S, Solms D, Hoogendoom M, Monge FJ, Gomaa OH, et al. Nursing Activities Score: an updated guideline for its application in the intensive care unit. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(Spec No):131-137. doi:10.1590/S0080-623420150000700019. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Altafin JAM, Grion CMC, Tanita MT, Festti J, Cardoso LTQ, Veiga CFF, et al. Nursing Activities Score and workload in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014;26(3):292-298. doi:10.5935/0103-507X.20140041. Google Scholar
[4]
4. Padilha KG, Sousa RMC, Queijo AF, Mendes AMC, Miranda DR. Nursing Activities Score in the intensive care unit: analysis of the related factors. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24(3):197-204. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2007.09.004. Google Scholar
[5]
5. Campagner AOM, Garcia PCR, Piva JP. Use of scores to calculate the nursing workload in a pediatric intensive care unit. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014;26(1):36-43. doi:10.5935/0103-507X.20140006. Google Scholar
[6]
6. Nogueira TA, Menegueti MG, Perdoná GSC, Auxiliadora-Martins M, Fugulin FMT, Laus AM. Effect of nursing care hours on the outcomes of intensive care assistance. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188241. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188241. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Sardo PMG, Macedo RPA, Alvarelhão JJM, Simões JFL, Guedes JAD, Simões CJ, et al. Nursing workload assessment in an intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study using the Nursing Activities Score. Nurs Crit Care. 2023;28(2):288-297. doi:10.1111/nicc.12854. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Batassini É, Beghetto MG. Comparing nursing workload for critically ill adults with and without COVID-19: retrospective cohort study. Nurs Crit Care. 2024;29(2):397-406. doi:10.1111/nicc.12977. Google Scholar
[9]
9. Dauvergne JE, Bruyneel A, Caillet A, Caillet P, Keriven-Dessomme B, Tack J, et al. Workload assessment using the Nursing Activities Score in intensive care units: nationwide prospective observational study in France. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025;87:103866. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103866. Google Scholar
[10]
10. Li L, Zou X, Chen H. Workload in ICU nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Nursing Activities Score. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025;91:104086. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104086. Google Scholar
[11]
11. Bộ Y tế. Thông tư số 31/2021/TT-BYT ngày 28/12/2021 quy định hoạt động điều dưỡng trong bệnh viện. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2021. Google Scholar