Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ13-HNKH Bệnh viện 19-8 10/09/2026

MOLECULAR CLASSIFICATION IN ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA – A NEW ERA IN TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS

Giang Lê Hải, Hân Phạm Thị, Hương Nguyễn Thúy, Lượng Lê Xuân
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD13.6409
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To review and update current evidence on the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma.

Materials and Methods: This narrative review was conducted through a selective synthesis of landmark studies and contemporary international guidelines on the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma, including those from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the World Health Organization (WHO), ESGO/ESTRO/ESP, FIGO, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

Results: Molecular classification categorizes endometrial carcinoma into four distinct subgroups: POLE-mut, dMMR/MSI, p53abn, and NSMP, each with unique biological features, prognostic implications, and therapeutic relevance. Among these, POLEmut tumors have the most favorable prognosis, whereas p53abn tumors are associated with the poorest outcomes; dMMR/MSI and NSMP tumors exhibit intermediate prognoses. The implementation of molecular classification in routine practice has been facilitated by immunohistochemical assessment of MMR proteins and p53, combined with targeted sequencing of the POLE exonuclease domain. Current international guidelines have incorporated molecular classification into risk stratification and treatment decision-making, supporting a more individualized approach to patient management.

Conclusion: Molecular classification provides important complementary information for prognostic evaluation and therapeutic decision-making in endometrial carcinoma. The appropriate integration of immunohistochemistry and molecular testing into routine pathology practice is expected to improve risk stratification and facilitate personalized management.

References
[1]
1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Liu Y, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):67-73. doi:10.1038/nature12113. Google Scholar
[2]
2. Wortman BG, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LCHW, et al. Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy. Br J Cancer. 2018;119(9):1067-1074. doi:10.1038/s41416-018-0310-8. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Van Gool IC, Eggink FA, Freeman-Mills L, Stelloo E, Marchi E, de Bruyn M, et al. POLE proofreading mutations elicit an antitumor immune response in endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(14):3347-3355. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0057. Google Scholar
[4]
4. León-Castillo A, Gilvazquez E, Nout RA, Smit VTHBM, McAlpine JN, McConechy MK, et al. Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of multiple-classifier endometrial carcinomas. J Pathol. 2020;250(3):312-322. doi:10.1002/path.5373. Google Scholar
[5]
5. León-Castillo A, Britton H, McConechy MK, McAlpine JN, Nout RA, Kommoss S, et al. Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma. J Pathol. 2020;250(3):323-335. doi:10.1002/path.5372. Google Scholar
[6]
6. Vermij L, Smit VTHBM, Nout RA, Bosse T. Incorporation of molecular characteristics into endometrial cancer management. Histopathology. 2020;76(1):52-63. doi:10.1111/his.14015. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Singh N, Piskorz AM, Bosse T, Jimenez-Linan M, Rous B, Brenton JD, et al. p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate surrogate for TP53 mutational analysis in endometrial carcinoma biopsies. J Pathol. 2020;250(3):336-345. doi:10.1002/path.5375. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg CL, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney DK, Kehoe ST, et al. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2023;162(2):383-394. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14923. Google Scholar
[9]
9. Kommoss S, McConechy MK, Kommoss F, Leung S, Bunz A, Magrill J, et al. Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(5):1180-1188. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy058. Google Scholar
[10]
10. Bosse T, Nout RA, Stelloo E, Dreef E, Nijman HW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, et al. L1 cell adhesion molecule is a strong predictor for distant recurrence and poor prognosis in endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(36):4050-4058. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.55.8926. Google Scholar