Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ13-HNKH Bệnh viện 19-8 10/09/2026

INITIAL RESULTS OF APPLYING 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY AT BAC NINH GENERAL HOSPITAL NO. 1

Chuẩn Nguyễn Văn, Dũng Trần Trung, Định Vũ Nhất, Thiện Dương Quốc, Hùng Nguyễn Mạnh, Định Hà Đăng
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD13.6403
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate initial results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using 3D-printed patient-specific instruments (PSI) at Bac Ninh General Hospital No. 1, June 2024 – August 2025.

Subjects and method: 17 consecutive patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing THA with 3D-printed PSI, selected by convenience sampling. Prospective case series. Primary outcome: deviation of actual cup abduction and anteversion angles from PSI plan measured on postoperative radiographs. Secondary outcome: Harris Hip Score (HHS). Significance threshold: p < 0.05.

Results: Mean age 55.0 ± 10.78 years (38–72); 94.12% male. Mean surgical time 75.29 ± 9.75 min; no blood transfusion; primary wound healing in 16/17 cases (94.12%), one superficial infection managed conservatively. Mean deviation: abduction angle 0.79 ± 1.75° (95% CI 0.07–1.51°); anteversion 0.72 ± 2.81° (95% CI −0.72–2.16°); 88.24% within 5° for abduction, 94.12% within 5° for anteversion. HHS improved from 51.59 ± 3.59 to 89.12 ± 5.57 (difference 37.53, 95% CI 35.12–39.94, p < 0.01). Good-to-excellent outcomes: 94.12%.

Conclusion: 3D-printed PSI achieved placement close to the preoperative plan and significantly improved postoperative hip function. Controlled studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are needed to confirm efficacy and durability.

References
[1]
1. Sathikumar AS, Jacob G, Thomas AB, Varghese J, Menon V (2023). Acetabular cup positioning in primary routine total hip arthroplasty — a review of current concepts and technologies. Arthroplasty, 5(1): 54. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00213-3. PMID: 38037156. Google Scholar
[2]
2. Seagrave KG, Troelsen A, Malchau H, Husted H, Gromov K (2016). Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Orthopaedica, 88(1): 10-17. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1251255. PMCID: PMC5251254. Google Scholar
[3]
3. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978). Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60(2): 217-220. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860020-00014. Google Scholar
[4]
4. Kunutsor SK, Barrett MC, Beswick AD, Judge A, Blom AW, Wylde V, Whitehouse MR (2019). Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements. Lancet Rheumatology, 1(2): e111-e121. DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30045-1. PMID: 35079707. Google Scholar
[5]
5. Henckel J, Holme TJ, Radford W, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2018). 3D-printed Patient-specific Guides for Hip Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 26(16): e342-e348. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00474. Google Scholar
[6]
6. Phạm Trung Hiếu, Võ Sỹ Quyền Năng, Vũ Tú Nam và cộng sự (2023). Đánh giá kết quả ban đầu phẫu thuật thay toàn bộ khớp háng sử dụng trợ cụ cá thể hóa. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 163(2): 155-163. Google Scholar
[7]
7. Nguyễn Ánh Ngọc (2022). Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật in 3D trong phẫu thuật thay khớp háng toàn phần. Luận văn Bác sĩ Nội trú, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. Google Scholar
[8]
8. Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, Sugano N, Yoshikawa H (2010). Tailor-made surgical guide reduces incidence of outliers of cup placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468(4): 1088-1095. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1158-2. Google Scholar
[9]
9. Spencer-Gardner L, Pierrepont J, Topham M, Baré J, McMahon S, Shimmin AJ (2016). Patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 98-B(10): 1342-1346. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37808. Google Scholar
[10]
10. Small T, Krebs V, Molloy R, Bryan J, Klika AK, Barsoum WK (2014). Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty, 29(5): 1030-1037. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.006. Google Scholar