Articles Vol. 67 No. Số CĐ12- Bệnh viện Ung bướu Nghệ An (2026) 25/08/2026

CLINICAL, HISTOPATHOLOGICAL, AND BRCA1/2 MUTATION CHARACTERISTICS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS TREATED AT NGHE AN ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL

Vu Dinh Giap1,2, Cao Ba Loi3,4, Duong Dinh Chinh3,4, Doan Thi Hong Nhat5,6
1 Nghe An Oncology Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Ung Bướu Nghệ An
3 National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology
4 Viện Sốt rét - Ký sinh trùng - Côn trùng Trung ương
5 Vinh Medical University
6 Đại học y khoa Vinh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD12.6370
38 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical and histopathological characteristics and BRCA1/2 mutation profiles in breast cancer patients treated at Nghe An Oncology Hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with analytical components was conducted among 373 breast cancer patients treated at Nghe An Oncology Hospital between 2024 and 2025. High-risk patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify BRCA1/2 mutations.

Results: Tumors were more frequently located in the right breast (52.55%), with the upper outer quadrant being the most common tumor location (56.3%). Stage II disease accounted for the largest proportion of cases (54.4%). Invasive ductal carcinoma was the predominant histopathological type (83.9%), and histological grade II accounted for the majority of cases (77.47%). Luminal B/HER2-negative was the most common molecular subtype. BRCA1/2 genetic analysis identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 10 high-risk patients (9.7%), including four patients (3.9%) with BRCA1 variants and six (5.8%) with BRCA2 variants. The most frequently detected mutation was NM_000059.4:c.6490C>T (p.Gln2164Ter), located in exon 11 of BRCA2. The P/LP variants identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were protein-truncating variants that were expected to affect the structure or function of the BRCA1/2 proteins. These variants were supported by strong evidence of pathogenicity according to the ACMG/AMP criteria, including PVS1 and PM2, and had been reported in ClinVar with multiple submissions or previously classified as pathogenic.

Conclusions: Breast cancer patients treated at Nghe An Oncology Hospital were predominantly diagnosed with stage II disease, and invasive ductal carcinoma was the most common histopathological type. Among 103 high-risk patients who underwent genetic testing, 10 (9.7%) carried P/LP variants in BRCA1/2, including four patients with BRCA1 variants and six with BRCA2 variants.

References
[1]
H. Sung et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021, doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Google Scholar
[2]
V. Barili et al., “Genetic Basis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Approaches and Lessons Learnt from Three Decades of Inherited Predisposition Testing,” Genes (Basel), vol. 15, no. 2, p. 219, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/genes15020219. Google Scholar
[3]
Y. Feng et al., “Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis,” Genes Dis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 77–106, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001. Google Scholar
[4]
Phạm H. K., Mai T. Đ., and Dương M. L., “ĐÁNH GIÁ ĐỘT BIẾN GEN BRCA1, BRCA2 TRÊN BỆNH NHÂN UNG THƯ VÚ CÓ NGUY CƠ CAO TẠI BỆNH VIỆN K,” VMJ, vol. 519, no. 2, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.51298/vmj.v519i2.3677. Google Scholar
[5]
Toàn T. T., Lan T. T. H., Linh N. T. T., Linh V. D., and Quang N. N., “BƯỚC ĐẦU NGHIÊN CỨU TÌNH TRẠNG ĐỘT BIẾN BRCA1/2 TRONG UNG THƯ VÚ BẰNG KỸ THUẬT GIẢI TRÌNH TỰ GEN THẾ HỆ MỚI TẠI BỆNH VIỆN K, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, Tập 521, trang 255-262.,” 2022. Google Scholar
[6]
Somal R và cs. (2023). Molecular subtypes of breast cancer and clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. Google Scholar
[7]
Đăng N. L. H. et al., “Tần suất và phổ đột biến gen của Hội chứng ung thư vú và buồng trứng di truyền trên quần thể người Việt Nam,” 1, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 130–135, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.46755/vjog.2022.3.1433. Google Scholar
[8]
X. Yu, C. C. S. Chini, M. He, G. Mer, and J. Chen, “The BRCT domain is a phospho-protein binding domain,” Science, vol. 302, no. 5645, pp. 639–642, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1126/science.1088753. Google Scholar
[9]
M. Rodriguez, X. Yu, J. Chen, and Z. Songyang, “Phosphopeptide binding specificities of BRCA1 COOH-terminal (BRCT) domains,” J Biol Chem, vol. 278, no. 52, pp. 52914–52918, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300407200. Google Scholar
[10]
M. K. K. Shivji, O. R. Davies, J. M. Savill, D. L. Bates, L. Pellegrini, and A. R. Venkitaraman, “A region of human BRCA2 containing multiple BRC repeats promotes RAD51-mediated strand exchange,” Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 4000–4011, 2006, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl505. Google Scholar
[11]
P. R. Andreassen, J. Seo, C. Wiek, and H. Hanenberg, “Understanding BRCA2 Function as a Tumor Suppressor Based on Domain-Specific Activities in DNA Damage Responses,” Genes (Basel), vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1034, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/genes12071034. Google Scholar
[12]
M. T. Parsons et al., “Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel,” Am J Hum Genet, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 2044–2058, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.013. Google Scholar