Articles T67 Số CDD10 - HN Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 2 - HN Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành

OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AT AN GIANG CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2024: CURRENT PRACTICE AND INFLUENCING FACTORS

Ong The Due, Dao Anh Son, Pham Ngoc Toan, Huynh Kim Chi
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67icd10.6215
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to describe the current practice of outpatient management for patients with type 2 diabetes and to analyze selected influencing factors at An Giang Central General Hospital in 2024.

Methods: A cross-sectional study combining quantitative and qualitative methods was conducted at the Outpatient Department of An Giang Central General Hospital from March to November 2024. The quantitative component included direct interviews and medical record reviews among 210 outpatients with type 2 diabetes. The qualitative component included 6 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions with managers, healthcare workers, and patients.

Results: The mean age of patients was 60.5 ± 11.1 years, and women accounted for 55.7%. The mean blood glucose level was 10.6 ± 6.1 mmol/L. Grade 1 and grade 2 hypertension accounted for 51.4% and 33.8%, respectively. Medical record management and follow-up scheduling were relatively well implemented: 100% of records were retained, treatment information was updated, and follow-up appointments were scheduled; 96.7% of data were stored using management software. Treatment counseling was recorded for all patients. However, several proactive follow-up activities remained limited, including reminders for missed follow-up visits (0.5%), blood glucose monitoring assessment (39.5%), blood pressure monitoring assessment (27.1%), and physical activity assessment (27.1%). Influencing factors included low income, older age, human resource shortages, workload pressure from multitasking, shortages of medicines and laboratory reagents, and poor data interoperability across health system levels.

Conclusion: Outpatient management for patients with type 2 diabetes was well implemented in terms of medical records, follow-up scheduling, and counseling. However, proactive follow-up, appointment reminders, monitoring of health indicators, and system-level resources should be strengthened.

References
[1]
[1] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47: S158–S178. Google Scholar
[2]
[2] Tân NV, Hương MT, Viên BÁ. Yếu tố ảnh hưởng tuân thủ điều trị ở bệnh nhân đái tháo đường típ 2 điều trị ngoại trú. TCNCYH 2025; 187: 305–313. Google Scholar
[3]
[3] Trần TM, Tạ VT. THỰC TRẠNG QUẢN LÝ NGƯỜI BỆNH ĐÁI THÁO ĐƯỜNG TÍP 2 ĐIỀU TRỊ NGOẠI TRÚ TẠI BỆNH VIỆN ĐA KHOA TỈNH TIỀN GIANG. VMJ; 525. Epub ahead of print 20 April 2023. DOI: 10.51298/vmj.v525i1B.5076. Google Scholar
[4]
[4] Minh VD, Nguyên PD, Vân NHN, et al. Đánh giá một số thuận lợi, khó khăn trong công tác quản lý người bệnh ngoại trú đái tháo đường tuýp 2 tại Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108. Journal of 108 - Clinical Medicine and Phamarcy. Epub ahead of print 25 May 2025. DOI: 10.52389/ydls.v20i3.2673. Google Scholar
[5]
[5] Nguyễn NP, Lê TB. TUÂN THỦ ĐIỀU TRỊ VÀ CHĂM SÓC TƯ VẤN CHO NGƯỜI BỆNH TĂNG HUYẾT ÁP ĐIỀU TRỊ TẠI BỆNH VIỆN ĐA KHOA KHU VỰC TỈNH AN GIANG. VMJ; 505. Epub ahead of print 11 September 2021. DOI: 10.51298/vmj.v505i1.1061. Google Scholar
[6]
[6] American Diabetes Association. Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes 2022; 41: 4–31. Google Scholar
[7]
[7] Trung NHH, Lan VTH. HOẠT ĐỘNG QUẢN LÝ ĐIỀU TRỊ NGOẠI TRÚ NGƯỜI BỆNH ĐÁI THÁO ĐƯỜNG TYP 2 VÀ MỘT SỐ YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG TẠI TRUNG TÂM Y TẾ THÀNH PHỐ MỸ THO NĂM 2025. YHCĐ; 66. Epub ahead of print 22 August 2025. DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD11.2792. Google Scholar
[8]
[8] Đức LX, Hòa NĐ, Lý NN, et al. QUẢN LÝ ĐIỀU TRỊ NGOẠI TRÚ NGƯỜI BỆNH ĐÁI THÁO ĐƯỜNG TYPE 2 VÀ MỘT SỐ YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG TẠI BỆNH VIỆN ĐA KHOA TƯ NHÂN BÌNH DƯƠNG GIAI ĐOẠN 2021-5/2023. VMJ; 530. Epub ahead of print 25 September 2023. DOI: 10.51298/vmj.v530i1B.6673. Google Scholar
[9]
[9] Fredericks KJ, Naidoo M. Quality of care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at a public sector district hospital. S Afr Fam Pract (2004) 2023; 65: 5713. Google Scholar
[10]
[10] Hà TT, Tuyển ĐQ, Huyền TTT, et al. TUÂN THỦ ĐIỀU TRỊ CỦA NGƯỜI BỆNH ĐÁI THÁO ĐƯỜNG TUYP 2 CÓ TỔN THƯƠNG THẬN ĐIỀU TRỊ NGOẠI TRÚ TẠI BỆNH VIỆN THANH NHÀN NĂM 2025. VMJ; 556. Epub ahead of print 2 December 2025. DOI: 10.51298/vmj.v556i1.16281. Google Scholar
[11]
[11] Chowdhury HA, Harrison CL, Siddiquea BN, et al. The effectiveness of diabetes self-management education intervention on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk in adults with type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2024; 19: e0297328. Google Scholar
[12]
[12] Woodward A, Walters K, Davies N, et al. Barriers and facilitators of self‐management of diabetes amongst people experiencing socioeconomic deprivation: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Health Expect 2024; 27: e14070. Google Scholar
[13]
[13] World Health Organization. Health workforce, https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-workforce (2019, accessed 3 May 2026). Google Scholar