Articles T67 Số CDD10 - HN Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 2 - HN Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành

KẾT QUẢ ĐIỀU TRỊ THOÁT VỊ BẸN Ở NGƯỜI CAO TUỔI BẰNG PHẪU THUẬT NỘI SOI HOÀN TOÀN NGOÀI PHÚC MẠC

Le Tien Dung1,2, Nguyen Van Hung3,4, Ho Huu Duc1,2,5,6
1 Thong Nhat Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
3 University of Health Sciences, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
4 Trường Đại học Khoa học Sức khoẻ, Đại học Quốc gia TP. Hồ Chí Minh
5 Nguyen Tat Thanh University
6 Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67icd10.6188
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes and safety of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (TEP) in the treatment of inguinal hernia in elderly patients, and to analyze factors influencing postoperative results.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 42 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent TEP at Thong Nhat Hospital from January 2020 to December 2024. Data were collected from medical records, including clinical characteristics, hernia type, operative time, complications, and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results: The mean age of patients was 67.6 ± 5.7 years, and all were male. Bilateral hernia accounted for 38.1%, while Nyhus type II made up 71.4%, and types IIIa and IIIb each 14.3%. The mean operative time was 85.7 ± 16.3 minutes, with no conversion to open surgery. Intraoperative complications occurred in 7.1%, and postoperative complications in 16.6%, mainly minor seroma or hematoma managed conservatively. The mean hospital stay was 3.3 ± 1.2 days. After 12 months of follow-up, recurrence and sensory disturbance were each 2.4%.

Conclusion: TEP is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of inguinal hernia in elderly patients, with a low complication rate, rapid recovery, and stable postoperative outcomes when performed by experienced surgical teams.

References
[1]
Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, et al. Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management. BJS Open. 2023;7(5):zrad080. doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080. Google Scholar
[2]
Andresen K, et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) for inguinal hernia repair: A Cochrane-style systematic review. Cochrane/Trials Evidence summary. 2024. Google Scholar
[3]
Basukala S, et al. TAPP compared to TEP for inguinal hernia repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;86:105033. Google Scholar
[4]
Iossa A, et al. TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how? Front Surg. 2024;11:1352196. Google Scholar
[5]
Xi S, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients under surgical–medical co-management. Int J Surg. 2024;114:60–66. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029325. Google Scholar
[6]
Golik D, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair in patients ≥70 years: A retrospective cohort study. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2024;19(2):101–108. Google Scholar
[7]
Girón F, et al. Outcomes of 207 TEP repairs with self-fixation mesh: Up to 5-year follow-up. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12515. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92063-9. Google Scholar
[8]
Andresen K, et al. Risk of reoperation after TEP, TAPP, and Lichtenstein: Nationwide cohort study. Hernia. 2025;29(1):45–54. doi:10.1007/s10029-025-03374-z. Google Scholar
[9]
Güler M, et al. Comparison of outcomes of TEP and TAPP; fixation strategy and chronic pain. J Acad Res Med. 2025;12(2):135–142. doi:10.4274/jarem.galenos.2025.74436. Google Scholar
[10]
Li X, et al. Meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia. PLoS One. 2024;19(6):e0298989. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298989. Google Scholar