Articles Vol. 64 No. 2 15/03/2023

14. OUTCOMES OF LABOR INDUCTION AMONG PREMATURE OF RUPTURE OF MEMBRANE AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Pham Van Hung1,2, Nguyen Quang Bac3,4
1 An Duc hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecoplogy
2 Bệnh viện Phụ sản An Đức
3 National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
4 Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương
Corresponding author: phamhung11369@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v64i2.616
12 Views
10 Downloads
Keywords
Premature rupture of membranes, labor induction, National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of induction of labor with oxytocin on pregnant women
with premature rupture of membranes at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Subjects and methodology: This is a descriptive study on 150 pregnant women with preterm
rupture of membranes during the period from August 2021 to August 2022 at the National Hospital
of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Results: Gestational age from 37-41 weeks accounted for 83.3%, and
from 28-31 weeks accounted for 1.3%. Cervical length at admission over 25mm accounted for 64%
after labor induction was 18.7%. After induction of labor with oxytocin, the average vaginal delivery
rate was 69.3%, and cesarean section was 30.7%. Level 3 success rate is 69.3%, and the failure rate
is 14%. The rate of amniotic infection was 3.3%, and neonatal infection was 2.7%. Conclusion:
Induction of labor with oxytocin was very effective in the subjects studied at the National Hospital of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, with meager rates of amniotic infection and neonatal infection. However,
monitoring for signs of bacteremia and neonatal sepsis needs to be more concerned with reducing
morbidity and mortality after birth.

References
[1]
Phạm Văn Khương, Nghiên cứu cách xử trí ối vỡ Google Scholar
[2]
non tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản trung ương năm 2008. Google Scholar
[3]
Luận văn tốt nghiệp chuyên khoa cấp II. Trường Google Scholar
[4]
Đại học Y Hà Nội. Google Scholar
[5]
Skupski D, Preterm premature rupture of Google Scholar
[6]
membranes (PPROM). Journal of Perinatal Google Scholar
[7]
Medicine, 2019. 47(5): p. 491-492. Google Scholar
[8]
Smith GN, Prevalence, Management, and Google Scholar
[9]
Outcomes of Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Google Scholar
[10]
the Membranes of Women in Canada. Journal Google Scholar
[11]
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2005. Google Scholar
[12]
(6): p. 547-553.104 Google Scholar
[13]
Mercer BM, Antibiotic therapy for reduction of Google Scholar
[14]
infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture Google Scholar
[15]
of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. Google Scholar
[16]
National Institute of Child Health and Human Google Scholar
[17]
Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Google Scholar
[18]
Network. Jama, 1997. 278(12): p. 989-95. Google Scholar
[19]
Müller H, Neurological outcome at 24 months Google Scholar
[20]
corrected age of prematurely born infants after Google Scholar
[21]
preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) Google Scholar
[22]
of at least 7 days: a two-center experience in Google Scholar
[23]
Germany. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Google Scholar
[24]
Medicine, 2020. 33(8): p. 1315-1320. Google Scholar
[25]
Lee SM, Frequency and clinical significance of Google Scholar
[26]
short cervix in patients with preterm premature Google Scholar
[27]
rupture of membranes. PLoS One, 2017. 12(3): Google Scholar
[28]
p. e0174657. Google Scholar
[29]
Mönckeberg M, Patients with acute cervical Google Scholar
[30]
insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/ Google Scholar
[31]
inflammation treated with cerclage have a good Google Scholar
[32]
prognosis. J Perinat Med, 2019. 47(5): p. 500-509. Google Scholar
[33]
Mays JK, Amniocentesis for selection before Google Scholar
[34]
rescue cerclage. Obstet Gynecol, 2000. 95(5): p. Google Scholar
[35]
-5. Google Scholar
[36]
Ibishi VA, Isjanovska R, Malin AE, Early-onset Google Scholar
[37]
neonatal infection in pregnancies with prelabor Google Scholar
[38]
rupture of membranes in Kosovo: A major Google Scholar
[39]
challenge. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2018. 15(3): Google Scholar
[40]
p. 171-176. Google Scholar
[41]
Endale T, Maternal and fetal outcomes in term Google Scholar
[42]
premature rupture of membrane. World J Emerg Google Scholar
[43]
Med, 2016. 7(2): p. 147-52. Google Scholar
[44]
Fishman SG, Gelber SE, Evidence for the clinical Google Scholar
[45]
management of chorioamnionitis. Semin Fetal Google Scholar
[46]
Neonatal Med, 2012. 17(1): p. 46-50. Google Scholar
[47]
Simhan HN, Canavan TP, Preterm premature Google Scholar
[48]
rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and Google Scholar
[49]
management strategies. Bjog, 2005. 112 Suppl 1: Google Scholar
[50]
p. 32-7. Google Scholar
[51]
Novianesari PH, Comparison between Google Scholar
[52]
leukocyte esterase activity and histopathological Google Scholar
[53]
examination in identifying chorioamnionitis. Google Scholar
[54]
Case Reports in Perinatal Medicine, 2018. 7(1). Google Scholar
[55]
Kunze M, Intrapartum management of premature Google Scholar
[56]
rupture of membranes: effect on cesarean delivery Google Scholar
[57]
rate. Obstet Gynecol, 2011. 118(6): p. 1247-1254. Google Scholar
[58]
Goldenberg RL, Epidemiology and causes of Google Scholar
[59]
preterm birth. Lancet, 2008. 371(9606): p. 75-84. Google Scholar
[60]
Beck C, Chorioamnionitis and Risk for Maternal Google Scholar
[61]
and Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Google Scholar
[62]
Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 2021. 137(6): p. Google Scholar
[63]
-1022. Google Scholar
[64]
Wortham JM, Chorioamnionitis and CultureConfirmed, Google Scholar
[65]
Early-Onset Neonatal Infections.Pediatrics, 2016. 137(1). Google Scholar