Articles Vol. 67 No. Số CĐ12- Bệnh viện Ung bướu Nghệ An (2026) 14/08/2026

TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF NEOADJUVANT PACLITAXEL-CARBOPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE III-IV EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER AT NGHE AN ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL

Nguyen Ngóc Tu1,2, Trinh Le Huy3,4, Duong Thi Sen1,2
1 Nghe An Oncology Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Ung bướu Nghệ An
3 Hanoi Medical University
4 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD12.6151
623 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical and paraclinical characteristics and evaluate treatment response in patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant Paclitaxel-Carboplatin chemotherapy at Nghe An Oncology Hospital.

Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included 50 patients with stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the paclitaxel–carboplatin regimen at Nghe An Oncology Hospital between January 2020 and June 2026.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 58 ± 7 years. Ascites was the most common clinical manifestation, occurring in 82% of cases. Most tumors measured ≥5 cm (80%), and high-grade serous carcinoma was the predominant histological subtype (64%). Serum CA125 levels exceeded 1,000 U/mL in 52% of patients. Stage IIIC and stage IV disease accounted for 58% and 42% of cases, respectively. The overall clinical response rate was 96%, including partial response in 84% and complete response in six patients (12%). Optimal cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 94% of patients. Histological subtype was significantly associated with clinical response to the regimen (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the paclitaxel–carboplatin regimen was associated with an objective response rate of 96% and an optimal cytoreductive surgery rate of 94% in patients with advanced-stage (FIGO III–IV) epithelial ovarian cancer who were not candidates for upfront surgery.

References
[1]
Cancer Today. Accessed July 18, 2025. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/ Google Scholar
[2]
Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ. Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(25):4065-4076. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.02765 Google Scholar
[3]
Heikkinen J, Kärkkäinen H, Eloranta ML, Anttila M. Postoperative Complications of Upfront Ovarian Cancer Surgery and Their Effects on Chemotherapy Delay. Curr Oncol. 2024;31(9):5630-5642. doi:10.3390/curroncol31090417 Google Scholar
[4]
Onda T, Satoh T, Saito T, et al. Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602. Eur J Cancer. 2016;64:22-31. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.017 Google Scholar
[5]
Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2015;386(9990):249-257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6 Google Scholar
[6]
Nguyễn Thị Thanh Loan. Đánh Giá Đáp Ứng và Một Số Tác Dụng Không Mong Muốn Hóa Trị Bổ Trợ Trước Phác Đồ Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Trong Ung Thư Buồng Trứng Giai Đoạn III-IV Tại Bệnh Viện K. Luận văn BSCKII. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2023. Google Scholar
[7]
Wright AA, Bohlke K, Armstrong DK, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer; Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Cinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Cin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34: 3460-3473. Doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.022 Google Scholar
[8]
Fagotti A, Ferrandina MG, Vizzielli G, et al. Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advenced orvarian cancer (SCORPION – NCT01461850). Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J int Gynecol Cancer Soc, 2020;30(11):1657-1664. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640 Google Scholar