Articles Vol. 67 No. Số CĐ12- Bệnh viện Ung bướu Nghệ An (2026) 14/08/2026

A CASE REPORT OF METANEPHRIC ADENOMA

Le Thi Linh1,2, Nguyen Nhu Tung1,2, Nguyen Phuc Thuc Uyen1,2
1 Tam Anh General Hospital Ho Chi Minh City
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hồ Chí Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD12.6138
644 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Background: Metanephric adenoma is a rare benign renal epithelial tumor, accounting for less than 1% of renal epithelial neoplasms in adults. Despite its benign biological behavior, MA is frequently misdiagnosed as renal cell carcinoma because of its nonspecific clinical presentation and overlapping imaging features. Case presentation: We report a case of a 28-year-old woman who presented with a 5.2 cm right renal mass detected on computed tomography, with imaging features raising suspicion for papillary renal cell carcinoma. The patient underwent radical right nephrectomy. Histopathological examination revealed a tumor composed of relatively uniform small cells arranged in tightly packed small tubules, microcystic structures, and glomeruloid bodies. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positivity for WT1, BRAF V600E, and Vimentin, with negativity for CK7 and ALK, findings consistent with a diagnosis of metanephric adenoma. Conclusion: Metanephric adenoma remains a diagnostic challenge due to its non-specific clinical and radiological presentation. Definitive diagnosis relies on characteristic histomorphology combined with immunohistochemical profiling, particularly the WT1(+)/BRAF(+)/CK7(-) phenotype. Accurate recognition of metanephric adenoma is essential to prevent overdiagnosis and avoid unnecessary radical surgery.

References
[1]
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Urinary and Male Genital Tumours. 5th edition. Lyon: IARC; 2022. Google Scholar
[2]
Davis CJ Jr, Barton JH, Sesterhenn IA, Mostofi FK. Metanephric adenoma: clinicopathological study of fifty patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(10):1101-1114. doi:10.1097/00000478-199510000-00001. Google Scholar
[3]
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Enzan H. Review of metanephric adenoma of the kidney with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol. 2003;18(1):253-257. doi:10.14670/HH-18.253. Google Scholar
[4]
Pins MR, Jones EC, Martul EV, Kamat BR, Umlas J. Metanephric adenoma-like tumors and papillary renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study. Mod Pathol. 1999;12(4):394-400. PMID: 10208118. Google Scholar
[5]
Zhu Q, Zhu W, Wu J, et al. CT and MRI findings of metanephric adenoma. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(3):234-238. doi:10.5152/dir.2014.13345. Google Scholar
[6]
Kuroda N, Hes O, Michal M, et al. Review of metanephric adenoma with focus on histopathological spectrum. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27(11):1415-1420. doi:10.14670/HH-27.1415. Google Scholar
[7]
Choueiri TK, Cheville J, Palescandolo E, et al. BRAF mutations in metanephric adenoma of the kidney. Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):917-922. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.028. Google Scholar
[8]
Caliò A, Eble JN, Brunelli M, et al. WT1 and BRAF immunoreactivity in metanephric adenoma: useful markers in differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol. 2016;57:79-84. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2016.07.009. Google Scholar
[9]
Wang P, Li H, Ding Q, et al. Adult metanephric adenoma presumed to be all malignant renal tumors. Urol J. 2015;12(1):2055-2060. PMID: 25657543. Google Scholar
[10]
Skinnider BF, Amin MB. An immunohistochemical approach to the differential diagnosis of renal tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005;22(1):51-68. doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2005.01.003. Google Scholar