Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ9-Hội Y học Giới tính 25/07/2026

NETWORK ANALYSIS OF ANXIETY, DEPRESSION, COPING STRATEGIES, AND SOCIAL SUPPORT: A GENDER COMPARISON AMONG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN HO CHI MINH CITY.

Ngo Thanh Nhu1,2, Dinh Thi Hong Dao1,2, Pham Trinh Cong Binh1,2, Kim Xuan Loan1,2
1 Department of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city
2 Khoa Y tế Công cộng, Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD9.5971
38 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To compare the network models of anxiety, depression, social support, and coping strategies among high school students in Ho Chi Minh city by gender.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1081 high school students in Ho Chi Minh city, utilizing the PHQ-9, GAD-7, CSI, and MSPSS scales. Network structures were estimated via Gaussian Graphical Models and gender differences were evaluated using the NetworkComparisonTest in R.

Results: The overall network structure was comparable between males and females. However, maladaptive coping strategies occupied central positions within the networks and differed by gender. In males, self-blame emerged as the primary central node, whereas in females, wishful thinking was most central, both were positively associated with anxiety and depression.

Conclusions: Maladaptive coping strategies were identified as central nodes within the network. Interventions targeting these gender-specific central nodes, while concurrently strengthening adaptive coping and social support, may contribute to improved mental health outcomes among adolescents.

References
[1]
Scardera S, Perret L.C, Ouellet-Morin I, Gariépy G, Juster R.P, Boivin M et al. Association of social support during adolescence with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in young adults. JAMA network open, 2020, 3 (12): e2027491. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27491 Google Scholar
[2]
Hampel P, Petermann F. Age and gender effects on coping in children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2005, 34 (2): 73-83. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-3207-9 Google Scholar
[3]
Constantin M. Sample size recommendations for estimating cross-sectional network models. AOJ Cramer - Tilburg University: Tilburg, The Netherlands, 2018. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=M6jdDnUAAAAJ&citation_for_view=M6jdDnUAAAAJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C Google Scholar
[4]
Niu C, Jiang Y, Li Y, Wang X, Zhao H, Cheng Z et al. A network analysis of the heterogeneity and associated risk and protective factors of depression and anxiety among college students. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15 (1): 6699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91025-9 Google Scholar
[5]
Zhang Z, Qiu A, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Yuan L, Yi J et al. Gender differences in the mental symptom network of high school students in Shanghai, China: a network analysis. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24 (1): 2719. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20130-7 Google Scholar
[6]
Tobin D.L, Holroyd K.A, Reynolds R.V, Wigal J.K. The hierarchical factor structure of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Cognitive therapy and research, 1989, 13 (4): 343-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01173478 Google Scholar
[7]
Krohne H.W. Stress and coping theories. Int Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sceinces, 2002. Google Scholar
[8]
Su Z, Yang X, Hou J, Liu S, Wang Y, Chen Z. Gender differences in the co-occurrence of anxiety and depressive symptoms among early adolescents: a network approach. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2024, 179: 300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.024 Google Scholar
[9]
Janoff-Bulman R. Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37 (10): 1798. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1798 Google Scholar
[10]
Snyder C.R. Hope theory: rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 2002, 13 (4): 249-75. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01 Google Scholar