Articles Vol. 67 No. 7 26/07/2026

SOME FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH REHABILITATION OUTCOMES AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR

Quach Long Vy1,2, Nguyen Truong Thien3,4, Nguyen Van Tuan5,6, Dang Quoc Huy6,7
1 Military Hospital 175
2 Bệnh viện Quân y 175
3 Military Hospital 7A
4 Bệnh viện Quân y 7A
5 Học viện quân y
6 Học viện Quân y
7 Vietnam Military Medical University
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i7.5938
41 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate several factors related to the outcome of shoulder rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon repair surgery at Military Hospital 175.

Research methodology: 108 patients diagnosed with rotator cuff tendon tears and treated with arthroscopic surgery at Military Hospital 175 between April 2025 and March 2026, followed by continued rehabilitation at rehabilitation centers or self-training according to the protocol. Results were assessed using the UCLA score, VAS pain score, shoulder range of motion, and rotator cuff strength 12 weeks post-surgery.

Results: After 12 weeks of rehabilitation, the rate of improvement in shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon repair surgery reached 87%. The group undergoing rehabilitation at healthcare facilities had a higher rate of functional improvement than the group self-rehabilitating at home (94.5% vs. 79.2%; OR = 4.54; p < 0.05). Statistically significant factors associated with rehabilitation outcomes included gender (p = 0.006), residential area (p = 0.031), and adherence to the rehabilitation program (p = 0.014).

Conclusion: After arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon surgery, the combination of early rehabilitation and adherence to the rehabilitation program is crucial in optimizing patient recovery outcomes.

References
[1]
Tăng Hà Nam Anh. Kết quả điều trị rách chóp xoay qua nội soi. Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2014. Google Scholar
[2]
Phan Đình Mừng. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm tổn thương kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị rách chóp xoay. Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Học viện Quân y, 2019. Google Scholar
[3]
Kun-Hui Chen, En-Rung Chiang et al. Arthroscopic partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears: factors related to greater degree of clinical improvement at 2 years of follow-up. Arthroscopy, 2017, 33 (11): 1949-1955. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.047. Google Scholar
[4]
Park J.S, Park H.J et al. Prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair in small to medium-sized tears. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43 (10): 2386-92. doi: 10.1177/0363546515594449. Google Scholar
[5]
Mall N.A, Lee A.S et al. An evidenced-based examination of the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29 (2): 366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.024 Google Scholar
[6]
Đinh Ngọc Anh, Vũ Thị Bích Hạnh. Kết quả phục hồi chức năng khớp vai sau phẫu thuật khâu rách chóp xoay khớp vai. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2022, 510 (1): 129-133. doi: 10.51298/vmj.v510i1.1916 Google Scholar
[7]
Gallagher B.P, Bishop M.E et al. Early versus delayed rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed, 2015, 43 (2): 178-87. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2015.1025683. Google Scholar
[8]
Lee B.G, Cho N.S et al. Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28 (1): 34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.012. Google Scholar
[9]
Oh J.H, Kim S.H et al. Effect of age on functional and structural outcome after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38 (4): 672-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546509352460. Google Scholar
[10]
Jack K, McLean S.M J et al. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther, 2010, 15 (3): 220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.004. Google Scholar
[11]
Raizah A, Reddy R.S et al. 2026, Effect of early physical therapy initiation and adherence on functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective observational cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne), 2010, 13: 1743180. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1743180 Google Scholar