Objective: To identify factors affecting apnoea time during high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNC) in patients undergoing endoscopic vocal cord surgery under general anesthesia. Subject and method: A prospective study was conducted at the 108 Military Central Hospital from October 2022 to December 2025. A total of 130 patients aged 25–77 years who were scheduled for endoscopic vocal cord surgery were included. All patients received total intravenous anesthesia with complete neuromuscular blockade and were maintained under apnoeic conditions using HFNC at flow rates of 40–70 L/min without mechanical ventilation. Apnoea time and related factors, including Mallampati classification, body mass index (BMI), and oxygen flow rate, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate linear regression models. Result: The mean apnoea time was 18.6 ± 2.5 minutes. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that Mallampati classification was significantly associated with apnoea time during HFNC use in endoscopic vocal cord surgery. Conclusion: Mallampati classification is an independent factor influencing apnoea time during high-flow nasal oxygenation in endoscopic vocal cord surgery under general anesthesia.
NGHIÊN CỨU CÁC YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG ĐẾN THỜI GIAN NGỪNG THỞ KHI SỬ DỤNG PHƯƠNG PHÁP OXY LƯU LƯỢNG CAO TRONG PHẪU THUẬT NỘI SOI DÂY THANH
18
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
endoscopic vocal cord surgery, high‐flow oxygenation, apnoeic time.
Abstract
References
[1]
Hermez, L., et al., A physiological study to determine the mechanism of carbon dioxide clearance during apnoea when using transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE). Anaesthesia, 2019. 74(4): p. 441-449. doi: 10.1111/anae.14541.
Google Scholar
[2]
Lyons, C. and M. Callaghan, Apnoeic oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen for laryngeal surgery: a case series. Anaesthesia, 2017. 72(11): p. 1379-1387. doi: 10.1111/anae.14036
Google Scholar
[3]
Egan M. and Redmond K.C., High‐flow apnoeic oxygenation delivered by LMA or tracheal tube for tracheal resection and reconstruction surgery. Anaesthesia Cases, 6 (1), 25-29. doi: 10.21466/ac.haodblo.2018.
Google Scholar
[4]
Gustafsson, I.-M., et al., Apnoeic oxygenation in adults under general anaesthesia using Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE)–a physiological study. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017. 118(4): p. 610-617. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex036
Google Scholar
[5]
Yang, S.-H., et al., Nonintubated laryngomicrosurgery with Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange: A case series. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 2019. 118(7): p. 1138-1143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.11.009
Google Scholar
[6]
Abad H.L.D., Ajalloueyan M., and Jalali A.R., Impact of body mass index (BMI) on ventilation during low-frequency jet ventilation. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 2007. 136 (3), 477-480. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.08.021
Google Scholar
[7]
Patel, A. and S.R. Nouraei, Transnasal Humidified Rapid‐Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia, 2015. 70(3): p. 323-329. doi: 10.1111/anae.12923
Google Scholar
[8]
To K., Harding F., Scott M., et al., The use of transnasal humidified rapid‐insufflation ventilatory exchange in 17 cases of subglottic stenosis. Clinical Otolaryngology, 2017. 42 (6), 1407-1410. doi: 10.1111/coa.12921
Google Scholar
[9]
Waters E., Kellner M., Milligan P., et al., The use of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) in one hundred and five upper airway endoscopies. A case series. Clinical Otolaryngology, 2015. 44 (6), 1115-1119. doi: 10.1111/coa.13408
Google Scholar
[10]
Kuo Y.-T., Chang T.-S., Tsai C.-C., et al., Optimizing nonintubated laryngeal microsurgery: The effectiveness and safety of superior laryngeal nerve block with high-flow nasal oxygen—A prospective cohort study. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 2024. 87 (3), 334-339. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001057
Google Scholar