Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ9-Hội Y học Giới tính 29/07/2026

OUTCOMES OF ARTIFICIAL CORPUS CAVERNOSUM IMPLANTATION FOR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION AT PEOPLE’S HOSPITAL 115

Truong Hoang Minh1,2, Tran Le Duy Anh1,2, Tran Thanh Phong1,2, Ngo Tri Thanh1,2, Ngo Quang Trung1,2, Nguyen Thanh Quang1,2, Le Vuong Tuan Kiet1,2, To Thanh Phat1,2, Truong Hoang Hai1,2
1 115 People’s Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Nhân dân 115
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD9.5803
58 Views
0 Downloads
Keywords
Penile prosthesis, erectile dysfunction, surgical outcomes.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation focusing on surgical efficacy, complication rates, and satisfaction of patients and their partners.

Methods: A prospective descriptive case series of 30 patients who underwent primary IPP implantation for erectile dysfunction at 115 People’s Hospital from July 2019 to March 2026. Satisfaction was assessed using QoLSPP questionnaires.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.63 ± 13.36 years. Device functionality was optimal in 100% of cases, with a mean operative time of 87.33 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. The postoperative complication rate was 10% (3 cases), comprising 1 instance of bleeding and 2 cases of postoperative fever, all managed successfully with medical treatment. During follow-up, 100% of patients and partners reported high satisfaction with sexual function restoration.

Conclusion: IPP implantation is a safe and highly effective treatment for erectile dysfunction, offering excellent complication control and outstanding satisfaction for both patients and partners.

References
[1]
Salonia A et al. EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health, 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.04.015 Google Scholar
[2]
Di Pierro G.B et al. Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a single-center study and literature review. Andrology, 2024, 12 (3): 624-632. doi: 10.1111/andr.13497. Google Scholar
[3]
Burnett A.L et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol, 2018, 200 (3): 633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004. Google Scholar
[4]
Stern N, Bajic P, Campbell J et al. Evolving medical management of erectile dysfunction: recommendations from the fifth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2024). Sex Med Rev, 2025, 13 (4): 513-537. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf035. Google Scholar
[5]
Hawks-Ladds N, Babar M, Labagnara K et al. Risk factors for reoperation of inflatable penile prosthesis among an ethnically diverse urban population in a high-volume center. Int J Impot Res, 2025, 37 (1): 37-44. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00966-8. Google Scholar
[6]
Ivan S, Pryor J, Maffucci F, Simhan J. Reservoir placement options: a state of the art review. Int J Impot Res, Published online May 12, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01082-x. Google Scholar
[7]
Atwater B, Krug A, Gross M.S, Marty-Roix R, Chapin L, Morey A.F. A review of the safety and efficacy of inflatable penile prosthesis ectopic reservoir placement. Sex Med Rev, 2025, 3 (1): 20-32. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qeae067. Google Scholar
[8]
Miller L.E, Khera M, Bhattacharyya S, Patel M, Nitschelm K, Burnett A.L. Long-term survival rates of inflatable penile prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology, 2022, 166: 6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.03.026. Google Scholar
[9]
Knoll P, Rai S, Talluri S et al. A survey of usage of penile prosthesis. J Sex Med, 2020, 17 (11): 2287-2290. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.082 Google Scholar
[10]
Chierigo F, Capogrosso P, Dehò F et al. Long-term follow-up after penile prosthesis implantation-survival and quality of life outcomes. J Sex Med, 2019, 16 (11): 1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Google Scholar