Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ9-Hội Y học Giới tính 29/07/2026

INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF TREATMENT RESULTS FOR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION USING THE ED60 MAGNETIC DEVICE

Truong Van Phi1,2, Nguyen Quang3,4, Nguyen Van Luyen1,2, Nguyen Thi Thu1,2, Tran Van Khoi5,6
1 Hanoi General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Hà Nội
3 Andrology Center, Viet Duc University Hospital
4 Trung tâm Nam học, Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức
5 Nguyet Cat Medical Equipment Company Limited
6 Công ty TNHH thiết bị y tế Nguyệt Cát
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD9.5792
39 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe clinical and paraclinical characteristics and evaluate the initial treatment outcomes of erectile dysfunction using the ED60 magnetic device.

Methods: A prospective descriptive study without a control group was conducted on 38 patients with erectile dysfunction. Initial treatment outcomes were assessed using the IIEF-5 score before and after intervention. Data were analyzed using statistical software with mean, standard deviation, and paired t-test, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results: After treatment, the IIEF-5 score significantly increased from 9.47 ± 2.75 points to 12.45 ± 2.55 points (p < 0.001). Improvement was observed across all age groups. The majority of patients reported acceptable or satisfactory outcomes following treatment.

Conclusion: Treatment with the ED60 magnetic device showed an initial improvement in IIEF-5 scores and no recorded complications during the short follow-up period. However, because this study had no control group, a small sample size, and limited follow-up duration, larger controlled studies are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness.

References
[1]
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health - 2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. European Urology, 2021, 80 (3): 333-357. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007 Google Scholar
[2]
MacDonald S.M, Burnett A.L. Physiology of erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am, 2021, 48 (4): 513-525. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.06.009 Google Scholar
[3]
Ma J, Wei J, Li J et al. Current treatment for erectile dysfunction: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Aging Male, 2026, 29 (1): 2640765. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2026.2640765 Google Scholar
[4]
Mondaini N, Crocerossa F, Abramo A et al. Flat magnetic stimulation technology: a promising therapy for erectile dysfunction management. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2025, 97 (4): 14515. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14515 Google Scholar
[5]
Nguyễn Hoài Bắc, Nguyễn Cao Thắng. Chuẩn hóa bộ câu hỏi IIEF-5 tiếng Việt và ứng dụng trong chẩn đoán rối loạn cương dương. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 2022, 152 (4): 86-94. doi: 10.52852/tcncyh.v152i4.739 Google Scholar
[6]
Nguyễn Văn Nghĩa, Đàm Văn Cương. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị rối loạn cương dương bằng Tadalafil tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa Trung ương Cần Thơ và Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ, 2023 (64): 137-144. doi: 10.58490/ctump.2023i64.1428 Google Scholar
[7]
Oliveira P.S, Ziegelmann M.J. Low-intensity shock wave therapy for the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction: a narrative review of technical considerations and treatment outcomes. Transl Androl Urol, 2021, 10 (6): 2617-2628. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1286. Google Scholar
[8]
Gresser U, Gleiter C.H. Erectile dysfunction: comparison of efficacy and side effects of the PDE-5 inhibitors sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil-review of the literature. European Journal of Medical Research, 2002, 7 (10): 435-446. Google Scholar
[9]
Evans J.D, Hill S.R. A comparison of the available phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a focus on avanafil. Patient Preference and Adherence, 2015: 1159-1164. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S56002 Google Scholar