Articles Vol. 67 No. CĐ8-NCKH 06/07/2026

LUNG CANCER RISK PREDICTION MODELS: A REVIEW

Tran Thi Thanh Huong1,2,3,4, Nguyen Huong Giang1,2,3,4, Do Vu Minh Ha1,2,3,4, Nguyen Thuy Duong1,3, Bui Thi Oanh1,2,3,4, Pham Tuong Van2,4
1 National Cancer Institute, K Hospital
2 Institute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University
3 Viện Ung thư Quốc gia, Bệnh viện K
4 Viện Đào tạo Y học dự phòng và Y tế công cộng, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD8.5707
38 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To systematically review lung cancer risk prediction models worldwide in order to describe their characteristics, risk factors, predictive performance, and applicability, thereby providing recommendations for Vietnam. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using both domestic and international databases up to January 2025. Studies were selected according to PICOS criteria and the PRISMA guidelines. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 72 studies were included in the analysis. Most prediction models were developed using logistic regression or Cox regression. Common risk factors included age, sex, smoking status and intensity, body mass index (BMI), family history of lung cancer, and chronic lung diseases. Models developed for smokers demonstrated moderate to good predictive performance (AUC 0.77–0.88), whereas models for non-smokers remain limited but are increasingly studied, particularly in Asian populations. Conclusion: Numerous lung cancer risk prediction models have been developed; however, most are based on Western populations. Their application in Vietnam requires validation and calibration to ensure they are suitable for local epidemiological characteristics.

References
[1]
Bray F., Laversanne M., and Sung H. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834 Google Scholar
[2]
Weber M., Yap S., Goldsbury D., et al. (2017). Identifying High Risk Individuals for Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: Independent Validation of the PLCOm2012 Risk Prediction Tool. Int J Cancer, 141(2), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30673 Google Scholar
[3]
Rubin K.H., Haastrup P.F., Nicolaisen A., et al. (2023). Developing and Validating a Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Cancers, 15(2), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020487 Google Scholar
[4]
Fu M., Travier N., Martín‐Sánchez J.C., et al. (2018). Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Lung Cancer Screening: Going Beyond NLST Criteria. PLoS One, 13(4), e0195441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195441 Google Scholar
[5]
Bach P.B., Kattan M.W., Thornquist M.D., et al. (2003). Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst, 95(6), 470–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/95.6.470 Google Scholar
[6]
Tammemagi C.M., Pinsky P.F., Caporaso N.E., et al. (2011). Lung cancer risk prediction: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal And Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial models and validation. J Natl Cancer Inst, 103(13), 1058–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr173 Google Scholar
[7]
Gustavo Borges da Silva Teles, Macedo A.C.S., Chate R.C., et al. (2020). LDCT Lung Cancer Screening in Populations at Different Risk for Lung Cancer. BMJ Open Respir Res, 7(1), e000455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000455 Google Scholar
[8]
Wolff R.F., Moons K.G.M., Riley R.D., et al. (2019). PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann Intern Med, 170(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1376 Google Scholar
[9]
Çorbacıoğlu Ş.K. and Aksel G. (2023). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk J Emerg Med, 23(4), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_182_23 Google Scholar
[10]
Robbins H.A., Alcala K., Swerdlow A.J., et al. (2021). Comparative performance of lung cancer risk models to define lung screening eligibility in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer, 124(12), 2026–2034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01278-0 Google Scholar
[11]
Katki H.A., Kovalchik S.A., Petito L.C., et al. (2018). Implications of 9 risk prediction models for selecting ever-smokers for CT lung-cancer screening. Ann Intern Med, 169(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2701 Google Scholar
[12]
Kim H., Kim H.Y., Goo J.M., et al. (2020). Lung Cancer CT Screening and Lung-RADS in a Tuberculosis-endemic Country: The Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project (K-LUCAS). Radiology, 296(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191806 Google Scholar
[13]
Yang J.J., Wen W., Zahed H., et al. (2024). Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Models for Asian Ever-Smokers. J Thorac Oncol, 19(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2023.10.015 Google Scholar
[14]
Wang F., Tan F., Shen S., et al. (2023). Risk-stratified Approach for Never- and Ever-Smokers in Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study in China. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 207(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202103-0690OC Google Scholar
[15]
Spitz M.R., Hong W.K., Amos C.I., et al. (2007). A risk model for prediction of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 99(9), 715–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk153 Google Scholar
[16]
National survey on the risk factors of noncommunicable diseases in Viet Nam, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789290620266 Google Scholar
[17]
Tammemagi M.C., Church T.R., Hocking W.G., et al. (2014). Evaluation of the lung cancer risks at which to screen ever- and never-smokers: screening rules applied to the PLCO and NLST cohorts. PLoS Med, 11(12), e1001764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001764 Google Scholar
[18]
Kim Y. (2019). Implementation of organized lung cancer screening program in Korea. Ann Oncol, 30, ii14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2019.02.040 Google Scholar
[19]
USPSTF, Krist A.H., Davidson K.W., et al. (2021). Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA, 325(10), 962–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.1117 Google Scholar
[20]
New lung cancer screening guideline – Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. https://canadiantaskforce.ca/new-lung-cancer-screening-guideline/ Google Scholar
[21]
Lam D.C.-L., Liam C.-K., Andarini S., et al. (2023). Lung Cancer Screening in Asia: An Expert Consensus Report. J Thorac Oncol, 18(10), 1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2023.05.024 Google Scholar
[22]
Wood D.E., Kazerooni E.A., Aberle D.R., et al. (2025). NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Lung Cancer Screening, Version 1.2025. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.0006 Google Scholar
[23]
Charvat H., Sasazuki S., Shimazu T., et al. (2018). Development of a risk prediction model for lung cancer: The Japan Public Health Center‐based Prospective Study. Cancer Sci, 109(3), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13484 Google Scholar