Objective: To evaluate predictive factors of severe respiratory acidosis in patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen during apnea in endoscopic vocal cord surgery. Subject and method: From October 2022 to December 2025, a prospective descriptive study was conducted at 108 Military Central Hospital. A total of 130 patients aged 25–77 years undergoing endoscopic vocal cord surgery were enrolled. All patients received high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNC) at a flow rate of 40–70 L/min, intravenous general anesthesia, complete neuromuscular blockade, and no mechanical ventilation during surgery. Demographic characteristics, airway assessment, apnea duration, and arterial blood gas parameters were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of severe respiratory acidosis at the end of surgery. Results: At the end of surgery, 7 patients (5.4%) developed severe acute respiratory acidosis beyond the predefined threshold. In univariate analysis, apnea duration and Mallampati classification were identified as predictive factors for severe respiratory acidosis. However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis, apnea duration was the only independent predictive factor. Each additional minute of apnea increased the risk of severe respiratory acidosis at the end of surgery by 30.6%. Conclusion: Apnea duration is the sole independent predictive factor of severe respiratory acidosis in patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen during apnea in endoscopic vocal cord surgery.
PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF SEVERE RESPIRATORY ACIDOSIS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH-FLOW NASAL OXYGEN DURING APNEA IN ENDOSCOPIC VOCAL CORD SURGERY SUMMARY
13
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
High-flow nasal oxygen, apnea, severe respiratory acidosis.
Abstract
References
[1]
Cherian V.T. and Vaida S.J., Airway management in laryngeal surgery. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,2019. 30 (4), 249-254.
Google Scholar
[2]
Flory S. and Appadurai I.R., Special considerations in anesthesia for laryngeal cancer surgery. An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics, 2010. 2 (3), 185-190
Google Scholar
[3]
Flach, S., et al., Transoral laser microsurgery using high‐flow nasal cannula oxygenation: Our experience of 21 cases. Clinical Otolaryngology, 2019. 44(5): p. 871-874.
Google Scholar
[4]
Hermez, L., et al., A physiological study to determine the mechanism of carbon dioxide clearance during apnoea when using transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE). Anaesthesia, 2019. 74(4): p. 441-449.
Google Scholar
[5]
Kim H.J., Lee C.Y., Lee K., et al. (2024). Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygenation and standard low-flow nasal oxygenation during rigid bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2024. 78 (1), 39.
Google Scholar
[6]
Lyons, C. and M. Callaghan, Apnoeic oxygenation with high‐flow nasal oxygen for laryngeal surgery: a case series. Anaesthesia, 2017. 72(11): p. 1379-1387.
Google Scholar
[7]
Gustafsson, I.-M., et al., Apnoeic oxygenation in adults under general anaesthesia using Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE)–a physiological study. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017. 118(4): p. 610-617.
Google Scholar
[8]
Patel, A. and S.R. Nouraei, Transnasal Humidified Rapid‐Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia, 2021. 76 (1), 27-35
Google Scholar
[9]
Riva T., Meyer J., Theiler L., et al., Measurement of airway pressure during high‐flow nasal therapy in apnoeic oxygenation: a randomised controlled crossover trial. BMC anesthesiology, 2022. 22(1): p. 1-7.
Google Scholar