Articles Vol. 67 No. CĐ8-NCKH 06/07/2026

MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE PERISTOMAL INFECTION FOLLOWING LONG-TERM PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY: A CASE REPORT

Le Thi Hang1,2, Nguyen Huu Quan1,2, Le Quang Tri1,2, Nguyen Thi Tham3,4, Nguyen Thu Huong3,4, Nguyen Thi Phuong3,4, Nguyen Thi Nhi3,4, Nguyen Hoang Nam3,4, Tran Thi Thuy Huong5,6
1 Bach Mai Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Bạch Mai
3 Hanoi Medical University Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội
5 Dong Da General Hospital
6 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Đống Đa
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD8.5556
49 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is widely used for long-term enteral feeding. Peristomal infection and gastrointestinal leakage are recognised complications, whereas deep abdominal wall extension with persistent leakage is uncommon.

Case presentation: A 72-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus, sequelae after cardiac arrest, tracheostomy, and PEG feeding for more than 3 years developed fever, impaired consciousness, profuse peristomal gastric leakage, and extensive anterior abdominal wall inflammation 3 days after routine PEG tube replacement. On admission, findings were consistent with severe infection, hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, and acute kidney injury.

Intervention and outcomes: Management included intensive resuscitation, broad-spectrum antibiotics, PEG tube removal, gastric decompression, jejunal tube placement for enteral feeding, and negative pressure wound therapy. Leakage progressively decreased, granulation tissue developed satisfactorily, and complete wound healing was achieved after 58 days.

Conclusion: In severe peristomal PEG infection with persistent gastrointestinal leakage, a combined approach incorporating infection control, source control, maintenance of enteral nutrition, and negative pressure wound therapy may result in favourable outcomes. Early recognition and close local monitoring remain essential.

References
[1]
Fugazza A, Capogreco A, Cappello A et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy: indications and techniques. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2022, 14 (5): 250-266. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.250 Google Scholar
[2]
Tae C.H, Lee J.Y, Joo M.K et al. Clinical practice guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Clin Endosc, 2023, 56 (4): 391-408. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.062 Google Scholar
[3]
Choi I.H, Cho Y.K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: procedure, complications and management. Brain Neurorehabil, 2022, 15 (1): e2. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e2 Google Scholar
[4]
Boeykens K, Duysburgh I, Verlinden W. Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 2022, 9 (1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-000975 Google Scholar
[5]
Rıdvan S, Güldan K, Rana B. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications and management. Discover Medicine, 2026, 3 (1): 1. doi: 10.1007/s44337-025-00525-0 Google Scholar
[6]
Pepe G, Chiarello M.M, Bianchi V et al. Entero-cutaneous and entero-atmospheric fistulas: insights into management using negative pressure wound therapy. J Clin Med, 2024, 13 (5). doi: 10.3390/jcm13051279 Google Scholar
[7]
Luglio G, Amendola A, Pagano G et al. Combined surgical and negative pressure therapy to treat multiple enterocutaneous fistulas and abdominal abscesses: a case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2020, 57: 123-126. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.037 Google Scholar
[8]
Stenberg K, Eriksson A, Odensten C, Darehed D. Mortality and complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective multicentre study. BMC Gastroenterol, 2022, 22 (1): 361. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02429-0 Google Scholar
[9]
Shehata M, Al Hosani I, Ahmed I et al. Factors associated with short-term complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a retrospective cohort study. Cureus, 2024, 16 (3): e55741. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55741. Google Scholar