Articles Vol. 67 No. CĐ6-NCKH 16/06/2026

RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY VIA MICRO-TUNNEL (14 Fr), WITHOUT URETERAL CATHETER PLACEMENT, ULTRASOUND GUIDED PANUCLEAR PATHOLOGY CONVENIENT USE of HOLMIUM LASER ADJUSTED SAINT PAUL GENERAL HOSPITAL FROM 2023-2025

Pham Van Khiet1,2, Bui Hoang Thao1,2, Le Duy Binh1,2, Nguyen Ngoc Luat1,2, Pham Trung Luong1,2
1 Saint Paul General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Xanh Pôn
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD6.5305
14 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes and safety of 14 Fr super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed without ureteral catheter placement, using ultrasound-guided access and Holmium laser lithotripsy at Saint Paul General Hospital.

Subjects and methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 120 patients who underwent 14 Fr super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position from December 2023 to December 2025. The technique included no ureteral catheter placement, ultrasound-guided renal puncture, 14 Fr tract dilation, Holmium laser lithotripsy, no nephrostomy tube placement, and JJ sonde placement in all patients.

Results: The mean age was 48.9 ± 21.8 years (11-79 years old), with males accounting for 65%. The mean stone size was 24.7 ± 8.3 mm; the most common stone locations were the lower calyx (39.2%) and renal pelvis (32.5%). Renal access was achieved through the middle calyx in 47.5%, the lower calyx in 44.2%, and the upper calyx in 8.3%. The mean lithotripsy and stone extraction time was 32.8 ± 23.2 minutes. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in 1.7% and postoperative bleeding in 0.8% of patients, with no cases requiring blood transfusion or angioembolization. Postoperative fever was observed in 6.7% of cases; no sepsis or organ injury was recorded. The mean VAS score was 2.5 ± 1.1. Hemoglobin levels decreased from 139.6 ± 31.8 to 128.9 ± 27.2, while creatinine levels were 80.3 ± 41.8 preoperatively and 85.1 ± 35.7 postoperatively. The early stone-free rate was 95.0%, increasing to 97.7% at one-month follow-up. No patient required additional intervention. The mean hospital stay was 2.9 ± 1.7 days.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided 14 Fr super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Holmium laser at Saint Paul General Hospital achieved high stone-free rates, low complication rates, and short hospital stay, representing an effective and safe option for the management of renal stones measuring approximately 2-3 cm in clinical practice.

References
[1]
Taylor E.N et al. Kidney stone disease. Kidney Int, 2005, 68 (3): 1230-1235. Google Scholar
[2]
Guddeti R.S et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi smaller than 2 cm: a randomized controlled study. BJU Int, 2020, 125 (2): 274-280. Google Scholar
[3]
Zeng G et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int, 2016, 117 (4): 655-661. Google Scholar
[4]
Desai J et al. A novel technique of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and initial experience. J Endourol, 2013, 27 (4): 409-414. Google Scholar
[5]
European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Arnhem: EAU Guidelines Office, 2024. Google Scholar
[6]
Sener N.C et al. Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal stones. Urol J, 2014, 11 (1): 1240-1245. Google Scholar
[7]
Ozgor F et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of lower calyceal stones. Urolithiasis, 2015, 43 (3): 283-287. Google Scholar
[8]
Chung Tuấn Khiêm và cộng sự. Đánh giá hiệu quả và độ an toàn của phương pháp lấy sỏi thận qua da với đường hầm siêu nhỏ. Tạp chí Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2018, 22 (2): 329-334. Google Scholar
[9]
Li Y et al. Analysis of factors affecting the efficacy and stone clearance rate of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol, 2025, 57 (7): 1-9. Google Scholar
[10]
Lahme S et al. Is ureteral catheter mandatory in percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol, 2001, 15 (8): 815-818. Google Scholar
[11]
Ganpule A.P et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheter: a feasibility study. World J Urol, 2011, 29 (5): 681-685. Google Scholar
[12]
Basiri A et al. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a safe and effective alternative to fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol, 2008, 22 (2): 281-284. Google Scholar
[13]
Agarwal M et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study. Urol Ann, 2011, 3 (3): 118-123. Google Scholar