Articles Vol. 67 No. 5 25/05/2026

SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING MOBILE-BEARING IMPLANTS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Nguyen Manh Khanh1,2, Nguyen Hoang Quan1,2, Le Xuan Hoang1,2, Nguyen Huu Cu3,4, Le Anh Tuan1,2
1 Department of Upper Extremity Surgery and Sports Medicine, Viet Duc University Hospital
2 Khoa Phẫu thuật chi trên và Y học thể thao, Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức
3 Ha Dong General Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Hà Đông
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i5.5139
28 Views
4 Downloads
Keywords
Knee osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty, Mobile Bearing, KSS, VAS.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed at Viet Duc University Hospital.

Subjects and methods: This study is a case series including six patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at Viet Duc University Hospital. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results: After surgery, the VAS pain score decreased from 7-8/10 points to 1-3/10 points. The KSS increased from 40-45 points preoperatively to 75-85 points postoperatively. Knee range of motion improved markedly, with an average postoperative flexion of 110-115°.

Conclusion: Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty is a safe and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis, providing significant pain relief and improvement in knee function.

References
[1]
Carr A.J et al. Knee replacement. The Lancet, 2012, 379 (9823): 1331-1340. Google Scholar
[2]
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6 Google Scholar
[3]
Smith A.J et al. Mobile Bearing versus Fixed Bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2017, 32 (5): 1669-1678. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.019. Google Scholar
[4]
Hunter D.J, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis The Lancet, 2019, 393: 1745-1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9. Google Scholar
[5]
Insall J.N et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989, 248: 13-14. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004. Google Scholar
[6]
Lingard E.A et al. Predicting outcome of TKA. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 2004, 86: 2179-2186. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00008 Google Scholar
[7]
Kim Y.H, Park J.W, Kim J.S. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 2014, 96 (6): e48. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00277. Google Scholar
[8]
Callaghan J.J et al. Mobile Bearing knee replacement complications. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 2000, 82: 102-111. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00013 Google Scholar