Articles Vol. 67 No. 5 25/05/2026

SEVERE HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK DUE TO SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF RENAL ANGIOMYOLIPOMA: A CASE REPORT

Ngo Dinh Trung1,2, Ho Nam1,2
1 Faculty of Surgical Intensive Care and Organ Transplantation, 108 Military Central Hospital
2 Khoa Hồi sức Ngoại khoa và Ghép tạng, Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i5.5138
28 Views
11 Downloads
Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous rupture of renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is a rare but life-threatening condition that can lead to severe hemorrhagic shock and acute kidney injury. AML is a benign mesenchymal tumor that is often asymptomatic but carries a risk of rupture, particularly in lesions larger than 4 cm or in patients with underlying conditions such as tuberous sclerosis complex. This case report highlights the intensive management of a patient with ruptured renal AML, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis, multidisciplinary collaboration, and advanced diagnostic tools.

Case presentation: A 37-year-old male with a history of bilateral AML was admitted due to spontaneous rupture of a large left renal AML, resulting in hemorrhagic shock (hemoglobin 1.9 g/dL), coagulopathy, and acute kidney injury. The patient required emergency intubation, aggressive resuscitation with blood products, and urgent left nephrectomy due to extensive tumor invasion. Postoperatively, the patient developed worsening acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, along with hemostatic management guided by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Despite the critical initial condition, the patient stabilized after 72 hours of intensive care, with gradual recovery of renal function and no additional complications.

Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges in managing ruptured AML, particularly in the setting of massive hemorrhage and acute kidney injury. It underscores the crucial role of early diagnosis, timely surgical intervention, and advanced diagnostic tools such as ROTEM in optimizing patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach, involving urologists and intensivists, is key to successful management.

References
[1]
Northrup H et al. Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: recommendations of the 2012 international tuberous sclerosis complex consensus conference. Pediatric Neurology, 2013, 49 (4): 243-254. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.001 Google Scholar
[2]
Monich A.G, Bissler J.J, Barreto F.C. Tuberous sclerosis complex and the kidneys: what nephrologists need to know. J Bras Nefrol, 2024, 46 (3): e20240013. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2024-0013en Google Scholar
[3]
Simkins A, Maiti A, Cherian S.V. Wunderlich syndrome. The American Journal of Medicine, 2017, 130 (5): e217-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.11.031 Google Scholar
[4]
Sharma S, Ali I, Shetty V. Wunderlich syndrome: a seldom presentation of a relatively ubiquitous tumor. Cureus, 2024, 16 (3): e56126. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56126 Google Scholar
[5]
Morales J.P et al. Embolization of a bleeding renal angiomyolipoma in pregnancy: case report and review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2005, 28 (2): 265-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-1850-2 Google Scholar
[6]
Nelson C.P, Sanda M.G. Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol, 2002, 168 (4 Pt 1): 1315-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64440-0 Google Scholar
[7]
Kluiving M.W et al. The effect of pregnancy on renal angiomyolipoma; a world of knowledge to gain, specifically in women with TSC. BMC Nephrology, 2024, 25 (1): 113. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03483-4 Google Scholar
[8]
Gaffoor N et al. Wunderlich syndrome: a rare case associated with bleeding renal angiomyolipoma (AML). Indian J Nephrol, 2024, 34 (3): 271-273. doi: 10.4103/ijn.ijn_397_23 Google Scholar
[9]
Flum A.S et al. Update on the diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol, 2016, 195 (4 Pt 1): 834-46. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.126 Google Scholar
[10]
Bhatt J.R et al. Natural history of renal angiomyolipoma (AML): most patients with large AMLs > 4 cm can be offered active surveillance as an initial management strategy. Eur Urol, 2016, 70 (1): 85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.048. Google Scholar