Articles Vol. 67 No. English Version No 1, 2026 02/06/2026

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PATTERNS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY PROFILES OF UROPATHOGENS AT TRA VINH GENERAL HOSPITAL

Tran Hoang Hieu1, Nguyen Thi Kieu Tien1, Nguyen Nhu Y1
1 Tra Vinh University
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iE1.5103
12 Views
7 Downloads
Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the top five most common hospital-acquired infections. Annually, millions of patients are affected by healthcare-associated UTIs, posing a major challenge to medical facilities worldwide.

Objective: To determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns and susceptibility profiles of each uropathogen isolated from inpatients with suspected UTIs who underwent urine culture at Tra Vinh General Hospital.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 132 patients (or episodes). Bacterial strains were identified and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the Vitek 2 automated system. Data were recorded from medical records.

Results: E. coli exhibited high resistance rates of >80% to Ampicillin, Piperacillin, and Fluoroquinolones (Ciprofloxacin). Bacterial isolates were more frequent than fungi (23.48% vs 8.33%). K. pneumoniae demonstrated 100% resistance to Ampicillin, Ampicillin-sulbactam, Cefepime, and Cefoxitin; resistance to Carbapenems, Aminoglycosides, and Fluoroquinolones ranged from 80% to 100%; and resistance to Cephalosporins exceeded 66.67%. P. aeruginosa showed a 50% resistance rate to Piperacillin-tazobactam, Piperacillin, Ceftazidime, Imipenem, Meropenem, and Ciprofloxacin. P. mirabilis was 100% resistant to Ampicillin, Piperacillin, Ciprofloxacin, and Tigecycline.

Conclusion: It is essential to prioritize urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing before antibiotic administration to guide appropriate treatment regimens, prevent misuse, and mitigate the risk of escalating antimicrobial resistance.

References
[1]
D. A. Mengistu, et al (2023), "Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection Among Patients: SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis", Inquiry, 60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231168746 Google Scholar
[2]
Yining He, et al (2025), "Epidemiological trends and predictions of urinary tract infections in the global burden of disease study 2021", Scientific Reports 15(4702), p. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89240-5 Google Scholar
[3]
Eulambius M. Mlugu, et al (2023), "Prevalence of urinary tract infection and antimicrobial resistance patterns of uropathogens with biofilm forming capacity among outpatients in Morogoro, Tanzania", BMC Infectious Diseases 23(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08641-x Google Scholar
[4]
Tran Quoc Huy, et al (2023), "Urinary Tract Infection And Antibiotic Resistance At Kien Google Scholar
[5]
Giang Provincial General Hospital In 2021", Vietnam Medical Journal 523(1), p. 256-261. Google Scholar
[7]
Nguyen Ngoc Lan, et al (2024), " Antibiotic Resistance Of Agents Causing Urinary Tract Google Scholar
[8]
Infections In Thong Nhat Hospital", Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine 65(10), p. 270-274. Google Scholar
[10]
Le Ha Long Hai, Nguyen Van An (2023), "Distribution Characteristic Of Bacterial Pathogens Google Scholar
[11]
Isolated From Urine Specimen Of Patients At Military Hospital 103 (9/2022–3/2023)”, Vietnam Google Scholar
[12]
[13]
B. Jwarchan, et al (2024), "Positive Bacterial Culture among Adults with Suspected Urinary Google Scholar
[14]
Tract Infections Presenting to the Department of Medicine of a Tertiary Care Centre", JNMA J Google Scholar
[15]
Nepal Med Assoc 62(270), p. 89-91. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.8438 Google Scholar
[16]
Lam Tu Huong, Huynh Minh Tuan, Tran Đang Khoa (2021), "Characteristics Of Urinary Google Scholar
[17]
Tract Infection Bacterial Pathogens And Antimicrobal Resistance Profiles At The Nephrology Google Scholar
[18]
Department, University Medical Center At Ho Chi Minh City", Ho Chi Minh City Journal of Google Scholar
[19]
Medicine, 25(1), p. 159-163. Google Scholar
[20]
Pham Thuy Yen Ha, Chung Kha Han, Dang Nguyen Doan Trang (2022), "Antibiotic Use In Google Scholar
[21]
The Treatment Of Urinary Tract Infection At Urology Department, University Medical Center Google Scholar
[22]
Hochiminh City", Vietnam Medical Journal 517(1), p. 132-138. Google Scholar
[24]
Que Anh Tram (2023), "Research of antibiotics resistance of gram-negative bacteria strains Google Scholar
[25]
causing urinary tract infections isolatedat Nghe An Friendship General Hospital", Vietnam Journal Google Scholar
[26]
of Science and Technology, 65(7), p. 12-16. https://doi.org/10.31276/VJST.65(7).12-16 Google Scholar
[27]
Nguyen Thi Hoa, et al (2022), " Catheter-associated urinary tract infections at the 108 Google Scholar
[28]
Military CentralHospital: Investigate the prevalence and antibiotic resistance ofbacterial Google Scholar
[29]
pathogens", Journal Of 108 - Clinical Medicine And Pharmacy, The 7th Vietnam-Lao Military Google Scholar
[31]
Le Thi Bao Chi, Nguyen Thi Van (2024), "Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients with urinary tract infections at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital", Hue Journal Of Medicine And Pharmacy 14(5), p. 144-152. Google Scholar
[33]
Shoaib Khan, Peer Maroof and Umara Amin (2023), "Microbial Etiology and Resistance Google Scholar
[34]
Patterns of Urinary Tract Infection at a Tertiary Care Centre – A Hospital based Study", J Pure Google Scholar
[35]
Appl Microbiol 17(3), p. 1659-1668. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.17.3.28 Google Scholar
[36]
Jalil and Mohammed Younus Naji Al Atbee (2022), "The prevalence of multiple drug resistance Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients with urinary tract infections", Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 36(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24619 Google Scholar
[37]
Bui Thi Hong Thanh, Dinh Thi Huyen Trang (2022), “The Antibiotic Resistance Of Google Scholar
[38]
Bacterial Strains Causing Urinary Tract Infections Isolated At Thai Binh General Hospital Google Scholar
[39]
From 2019 - 2020”, Thai Binh Journal of Medicine and Phamarcy 1(5), p. 98-102. Google Scholar